mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation models

arXiv 2503.09707 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) leverages abundant unlabeled data alongside limited labeled data to enhance learning. As vision foundation models (VFMs) increasingly serve as the backbone of vision applications, it remains unclear how SSL interacts with these pre-trained models. To address this gap, we develop new SSL benchmark datasets where frozen VFMs underperform and systematically evaluate representative SSL methods. We make a surprising observation: parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using only labeled data often matches SSL performance, even without leveraging unlabeled data. This motivates us to revisit self-training, a conceptually simple SSL baseline, where we use the supervised PEFT model to pseudo-label unlabeled data for further training. To overcome the notorious issue of noisy pseudo-labels, we propose ensembling multiple PEFT approaches and VFM backbones to produce more robust pseudo-labels. Empirical results validate the effectiveness of this simple yet powerful approach, providing actionable insights into SSL with VFMs and paving the way for more scalable and practical semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

46 of 84 references.

References · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  8. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  10. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  11. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  12. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
34 more
  1. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  2. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  3. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  5. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  6. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 834
  7. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
  8. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  9. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  10. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  11. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
  12. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  13. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  14. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
  15. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  16. 2021A Survey on Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 250
  17. 2019Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationcited by 232
  18. 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 205
  19. 2022RankMe: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rankcited by 145
  20. 2020Towards Discriminability and Diversity: Batch Nuclear-norm Maximization under Label Insufficient Situationscited by 133
  21. 2022FacT: Factor-Tuning for Lightweight Adaptation on Vision Transformercited by 133
  22. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  23. 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 120
  24. 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 85
  25. 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57
  26. 2023Enhancing CLIP with CLIP: Exploring Pseudolabeling for Limited-Label Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  27. 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibratedcited by 24
  28. 2024Erasing the Bias: Fine-Tuning Foundation Models for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 19
  29. 2024Candidate Pseudolabel Learning: Enhancing Vision-Language Models by Prompt Tuning with Unlabeled Datacited by 19
  30. 2024OT-VP: Optimal Transport-guided Visual Prompting for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 17
  31. 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
  32. 2023Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by bridging high and low-confidence predictionscited by 11
  33. 2025A Stronger Mixture of Low-Rank Experts for Fine-Tuning Foundation Modelscited by 9
  34. 2023Holistic Transfer: Towards Non-Disruptive Fine-Tuning with Partial Target Datacited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.