mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TarGEN: Targeted Data Generation with Large Language Models

arXiv 2310.17876 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has sparked interest in data synthesis techniques, aiming to generate diverse and high-quality synthetic datasets. However, these synthetic datasets often suffer from a lack of diversity and added noise. In this paper, we present TarGEN, a multi-step prompting strategy for generating high-quality synthetic datasets utilizing a LLM. An advantage of TarGEN is its seedless nature; it does not require specific task instances, broadening its applicability beyond task replication. We augment TarGEN with a method known as self-correction empowering LLMs to rectify inaccurately labeled instances during dataset creation, ensuring reliable labels. To assess our technique's effectiveness, we emulate 8 tasks from the SuperGLUE benchmark and finetune various language models, including encoder-only, encoder-decoder, and decoder-only models on both synthetic and original training sets. Evaluation on the original test set reveals that models trained on datasets generated by TarGEN perform approximately 1-2% points better than those trained on original datasets (82.84% via syn. vs. 81.12% on og. using Flan-T5). When incorporating instruction tuning, the performance increases to 84.54% on synthetic data vs. 81.49% on original data by Flan-T5. A comprehensive analysis of the synthetic dataset compared to the original dataset reveals that the synthetic dataset demonstrates similar or higher levels of dataset complexity and diversity. Furthermore, the synthetic dataset displays a bias level that aligns closely with the original dataset. Finally, when pre-finetuned on our synthetic SuperGLUE dataset, T5-3B yields impressive results on the OpenLLM leaderboard, surpassing the model trained on the Self-Instruct dataset by 4.14% points. We hope that TarGEN can be helpful for quality data generation and reducing the human efforts to create complex benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2023.

Builds on

49 of 61 references.

References · 49

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  12. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
37 more
  1. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  2. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  4. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  6. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  7. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  8. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  9. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  10. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  11. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  12. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  13. 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 290
  14. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  15. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
  16. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 209
  17. 2022WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creationcited by 200
  18. 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
  19. 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 198
  20. 2021Generating Datasets with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 192
  21. 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
  22. 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
  23. 2021Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanationscited by 125
  24. 2023Machine Learning for Synthetic Data Generation: A Reviewcited by 118
  25. 2023Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Clustercited by 106
  26. 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 96
  27. 2023Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?cited by 69
  28. 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
  29. 2022RelationPrompt: Leveraging Prompts to Generate Synthetic Data for Zero-Shot Relation Triplet Extractioncited by 60
  30. 2022Self-Guided Noise-Free Data Generation for Efficient Zero-Shot Learningcited by 49
  31. 2022Don't Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructionscited by 47
  32. 2023ReGen: Zero-Shot Text Classification via Training Data Generation with Progressive Dense Retrievalcited by 26
  33. 2023Mixture of Soft Prompts for Controllable Data Generationcited by 23
  34. 2023InstructABSA: Instruction Learning for Aspect Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 22
  35. 2023Instruction Tuned Models are Quick Learnerscited by 21
  36. 2022"John is 50 years old, can his son be 65?" Evaluating NLP Models' Understanding of Feasibilitycited by 15
  37. 2021Context-NER : Contextual Phrase Generation at Scalecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DataGen: Unified Synthetic Dataset Generation via Large Language Models
  2. 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
  3. 2025BARE: Leveraging Base Language Models for Few-Shot Synthetic Data Generation
  4. 2024A Survey on Data Synthesis and Augmentation for Large Language Models
  5. 2024Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration
  6. 2024Better Synthetic Data by Retrieving and Transforming Existing Datasets
  7. 2025FASTGEN: Fast and Cost-Effective Synthetic Tabular Data Generation with LLMs
  8. 2023Synthetic Data Generation in Low-Resource Settings via Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models