Reasoning-Driven Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although many AI applications of interest require specialized multi-modal models, relevant data to train such models is inherently scarce or inaccessible. Filling these gaps with human annotators is prohibitively expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming, leading model builders to increasingly consider synthetic data as a scalable alternative. However, existing synthetic data generation methods often rely on manual prompts, evolutionary algorithms, or extensive seed data from the target distribution - limiting their scalability, explainability, and control. In this paper, we introduce Simula: a novel reasoning-driven framework for data generation and evaluation. It employs a seedless, agentic approach to generate synthetic datasets at scale, allowing users to define desired dataset characteristics through an explainable and controllable process that enables fine-grained resource allocation. We show the efficacy of our approach on a variety of datasets, rigorously testing both intrinsic and downstream properties. Our work (1) offers guidelines for synthetic data mechanism design, (2) provides insights into generating and evaluating synthetic data at scale, and (3) unlocks new opportunities for developing and deploying AI in domains where data scarcity or privacy concerns are paramount.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.
Builds on
72 of 106 references.
References · 72
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
38 more
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
- 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
- 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 380
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
- 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
- 2024Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluationcited by 191
- 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 184
- 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 150
- 2020Descending through a Crowded Valley - Benchmarking Deep Learning Optimizerscited by 119
- 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
- 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
- 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 104
- 2024Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Modelscited by 99
- 2024The rising costs of training frontier AI modelscited by 95
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026The Future of Facts: Tracing the Factual Generation-Verification Gapcited by 1
- 2026"Skill Issues'': Data-Centric Optimization of Lakehouse Agentscited by 1
- 2026NodeSynth: Socially Aligned Synthetic Data for AI Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Project Auto-World: Towards Automated Benchmarking of Neural Relational Reasonerscited by 0
- 2026KMGen: A Skill-based Approach for Synthetic Individual Patient Data Generationcited by 0
- 2026KMGen: A Skill-based Approach for Synthetic Individual Patient Data Generation23 Aug 2026
- 2026Project Auto-World: Towards Automated Benchmarking of Neural Relational Reasoners23 Jun 2026
- 2026"Skill Issues'': Data-Centric Optimization of Lakehouse Agents31 May 2026
- 2026The Future of Facts: Tracing the Factual Generation-Verification Gap26 May 2026
- 2026NodeSynth: Socially Aligned Synthetic Data for AI Evaluation14 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic data
- 2024Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data
- 2026Synthesis Without Training: An Inference-Only Pipeline for Tabular, Temporal, and Relational Synthetic Data
- 2024Generative AI for Synthetic Data Generation: Methods, Challenges and the Future
- 2026ORACLE: Optimizing Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models via Constraint-Led Synthetic Data Elicitation
- 2025Learning from Reasoning Failures via Synthetic Data Generation
- 2024CI-Bench: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity of AI Assistants on Synthetic Data
- 2025Generate, Evaluate, Iterate: Synthetic Data for Human-in-the-Loop Refinement of LLM Judges