mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection Defenses: An Empty Promise against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Optical Flow

arXiv 2310.17403 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial patches undermine the reliability of optical flow predictions when placed in arbitrary scene locations. Therefore, they pose a realistic threat to real-world motion detection and its downstream applications. Potential remedies are defense strategies that detect and remove adversarial patches, but their influence on the underlying motion prediction has not been investigated. In this paper, we thoroughly examine the currently available detect-and-remove defenses ILP and LGS for a wide selection of state-of-the-art optical flow methods, and illuminate their side effects on the quality and robustness of the final flow predictions. In particular, we implement defense-aware attacks to investigate whether current defenses are able to withstand attacks that take the defense mechanism into account. Our experiments yield two surprising results: Detect-and-remove defenses do not only lower the optical flow quality on benign scenes, in doing so, they also harm the robustness under patch attacks for all tested optical flow methods except FlowNetC. As currently employed detect-and-remove defenses fail to deliver the promised adversarial robustness for optical flow, they evoke a false sense of security. The code is available at https://github.com/cv-stuttgart/DetectionDefenses.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.

Builds on

40 of 52 references.

References · 40

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  8. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,054
  9. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
  10. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  11. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  12. 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
28 more
  1. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  2. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  3. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  4. 2016Optical Flow Estimation using a Spatial Pyramid Networkcited by 421
  5. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
  6. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
  7. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  8. 2021Learning to Estimate Hidden Motions with Global Motion Aggregationcited by 223
  9. 2023Spring: A High-Resolution High-Detail Dataset and Benchmark for Scene Flow, Optical Flow and Stereocited by 170
  10. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 100
  11. 2020(De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch Attackscited by 97
  12. 2018Local Gradients Smoothing: Defense against localized adversarial attackscited by 85
  13. 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
  14. 2020Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patchescited by 50
  15. 2019Attacking Optical Flowcited by 41
  16. 2020Minority Reports Defense: Defending Against Adversarial Patchescited by 36
  17. 2022Disentangling Architecture and Training for Optical Flowcited by 32
  18. 2020Adversarial Patch Attacks on Monocular Depth Estimation Networkscited by 29
  19. 2023CosPGD: an efficient white-box adversarial attack for pixel-wise prediction taskscited by 27
  20. 2022A Perturbation-Constrained Adversarial Attack for Evaluating the Robustness of Optical Flowcited by 16
  21. 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?cited by 16
  22. 2021Towards Understanding Adversarial Robustness of Optical Flow Networkscited by 15
  23. 2023Distracting Downpour: Adversarial Weather Attacks for Motion Estimationcited by 15
  24. 2018Adversarial Attacks for Optical Flow-Based Action Recognition Classifierscited by 14
  25. 2020Vax-a-Net: Training-time Defence Against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 11
  26. 2022Attacking Motion Estimation with Adversarial Snowcited by 9
  27. 2021Consistent Semantic Attacks on Optical Flowcited by 4
  28. 2022Adversarially Robust Video Perception by Seeing Motioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

6 papers.