mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

K-HATERS: A Hate Speech Detection Corpus in Korean with Target-Specific Ratings

arXiv 2310.15439 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.SIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous datasets have been proposed to combat the spread of online hate. Despite these efforts, a majority of these resources are English-centric, primarily focusing on overt forms of hate. This research gap calls for developing high-quality corpora in diverse languages that also encapsulate more subtle hate expressions. This study introduces K-HATERS, a new corpus for hate speech detection in Korean, comprising approximately 192K news comments with target-specific offensiveness ratings. This resource is the largest offensive language corpus in Korean and is the first to offer target-specific ratings on a three-point Likert scale, enabling the detection of hate expressions in Korean across varying degrees of offensiveness. We conduct experiments showing the effectiveness of the proposed corpus, including a comparison with existing datasets. Additionally, to address potential noise and bias in human annotations, we explore a novel idea of adopting the Cognitive Reflection Test, which is widely used in social science for assessing an individual's cognitive ability, as a proxy of labeling quality. Findings indicate that annotations from individuals with the lowest test scores tend to yield detection models that make biased predictions toward specific target groups and are less accurate. This study contributes to the NLP research on hate speech detection and resource construction. The code and dataset can be accessed at https://github.com/ssu-humane/K-HATERS.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 38 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  3. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  4. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  5. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  6. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  7. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  8. 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
  9. 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
  10. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  11. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  12. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
5 more
  1. 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
  2. 2020BEEP! Korean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detectioncited by 39
  3. 2022Improving Generalizability in Implicitly Abusive Language Detection with Concept Activation Vectorscited by 14
  4. 2022K-MHaS: A Multi-label Hate Speech Detection Dataset in Korean Online News Commentcited by 13
  5. 2022APEACH: Attacking Pejorative Expressions with Analysis on Crowd-Generated Hate Speech Evaluation Datasetscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.