On the Transferability of Learning Models for Semantic Segmentation for Remote Sensing Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent deep learning-based methods outperform traditional learning methods on remote sensing (RS) semantic segmentation/classification tasks. However, they require large training datasets and are generally known for lack of transferability due to the highly disparate RS image content across different geographical regions. Yet, there is no comprehensive analysis of their transferability, i.e., to which extent a model trained on a source domain can be readily applicable to a target domain. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to investigate the raw transferability of traditional and deep learning (DL) models, as well as the effectiveness of domain adaptation (DA) approaches in enhancing the transferability of the DL models (adapted transferability). By utilizing four highly diverse RS datasets, we train six models with and without three DA approaches to analyze their transferability between these datasets quantitatively. Furthermore, we developed a straightforward method to quantify the transferability of a model using the spectral indices as a medium and have demonstrated its effectiveness in evaluating the model transferability at the target domain when the labels are unavailable. Our experiments yield several generally important yet not well-reported observations regarding the raw and adapted transferability. Moreover, our proposed label-free transferability assessment method is validated to be better than posterior model confidence. The findings can guide the future development of generalized RS learning models. The trained models are released under this link: https://github.com/GDAOSU/Transferability-Remote-Sensing
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2023.
Builds on
19 of 56 references.
References · 19
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
- 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
- 2018Taking A Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptationcited by 295
- 2021Prototypical Pseudo Label Denoising and Target Structure Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 268
- 2019BigEarthNet: A Large-Scale Benchmark Archive For Remote Sensing Image Understandingcited by 231
- 2019High-Resolution Representations for Labeling Pixels and Regionscited by 211
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2020Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable developmentcited by 71
7 more
- 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
- 2022Cross-Domain Correlation Distillation for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Nighttime Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
- 2022EarthNets: Empowering AI in Earth Observationcited by 40
- 2019ColorMapGAN: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation Using Color Mapping Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 26
- 2020DAugNet: Unsupervised, Multi-source, Multi-target, and Life-long Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Satellite Imagescited by 13
- 2019Automated 3D recovery from very high resolution multi-view satellite imagescited by 6
- 2020Scale Aware Adaptation for Land-Cover Classification in Remote Sensing Imagerycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.