Two-Stage Adaptive Network for Semi-Supervised Cross-Domain Crater Detection under Varying Scenario Distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crater detection can provide valuable information for humans to explore the topography and understand the history of extraterrestrial planets. Due to the significantly varying scenario distributions, existing detection models trained on known labelled crater datasets are hardly effective when applied to new unlabelled planets. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage adaptive network (TAN) for semi-supervised cross-domain crater detection. Our network is built on the YOLOv5 detector, where a series of strategies are employed to enhance its cross-domain generalisation ability. In the first stage, we propose an attention-based scale-adaptive fusion (ASAF) strategy to handle objects with significant scale variances. Furthermore, we propose a smoothing hard example mining (SHEM) loss function to address the issue of overfitting on hard examples. In the second stage, we propose a sort-based pseudo-labelling fine-tuning (SPF) strategy for semi-supervised learning to mitigate the distributional differences between source and target domains. For both stages, we employ weak or strong image augmentation to suit different cross-domain tasks. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed network can enhance domain adaptation ability for crater detection under varying scenario distributions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.
Builds on
47 of 65 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
- 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
35 more
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
- 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 796
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 622
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
- 2019ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
- 2019Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecturecited by 468
- 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
- 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
- 2019CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNNcited by 381
- 2020DetectoRS: Detecting Objects with Recursive Feature Pyramid and Switchable Atrous Convolutioncited by 222
- 2022MAGE: MAsked Generative Encoder to Unify Representation Learning and Image Synthesiscited by 222
- 2019Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detectioncited by 159
- 2023BiFormer: Vision Transformer with Bi-Level Routing Attentioncited by 150
- 2020Memory Enhanced Global-Local Aggregation for Video Object Detectioncited by 128
- 2021Cross-Domain Adaptive Teacher for Object Detectioncited by 125
- 2022SimMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Similarity Matchingcited by 118
- 2020Every Pixel Matters: Center-aware Feature Alignment for Domain Adaptive Object Detectorcited by 106
- 2022AUC Maximization in the Era of Big Data and AI: A Surveycited by 100
- 2019Augmentation for small object detectioncited by 73
- 2019Learning Spatial Fusion for Single-Shot Object Detectioncited by 59
- 2021Global Attention Mechanism: Retain Information to Enhance Channel-Spatial Interactionscited by 39
- 2019Side-Aware Boundary Localization for More Precise Object Detectioncited by 36
- 20232PCNet: Two-Phase Consistency Training for Day-to-Night Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 30
- 2023Multi-view Adversarial Discriminator: Mine the Non-causal Factors for Object Detection in Unseen Domainscited by 24
- 2023SOOD: Towards Semi-Supervised Oriented Object Detectioncited by 19
- 2020Object Instance Mining for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 18
- 2022Target-Relevant Knowledge Preservation for Multi-Source Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 14
- 2021Towards Balanced Learning for Instance Recognitioncited by 9
- 2023Robust Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Unified Multi-Granularity Alignmentcited by 6
- 2023DETR with Additional Global Aggregation for Cross-domain Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2018Loss Rank Mining: A General Hard Example Mining Method for Real-time Detectorscited by 4
- 2022Improved Hard Example Mining Approach for Single Shot Object Detectorscited by 3
- 2023On the Transferability of Learning Models for Semantic Segmentation for Remote Sensing Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.