mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confounding-Robust Policy Improvement with Human-AI Teams

arXiv 2310.08824 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2023cs.HC stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human-AI collaboration has the potential to transform various domains by leveraging the complementary strengths of human experts and Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. However, unobserved confounding can undermine the effectiveness of this collaboration, leading to biased and unreliable outcomes. In this paper, we propose a novel solution to address unobserved confounding in human-AI collaboration by employing sensitivity analysis from causal inference. Our approach combines domain expertise with AI-driven statistical modeling to account for potentially hidden confounders. We present a deferral collaboration framework for incorporating the sensitivity model into offline policy learning, enabling the system to control for the influence of unobserved confounding factors. In addition, we propose a personalized deferral collaboration system to leverage the diverse expertise of different human decision-makers. By adjusting for potential biases, our proposed solution enhances the robustness and reliability of collaborative outcomes. The empirical and theoretical analyses demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in mitigating unobserved confounding and improving the overall performance of human-AI collaborations.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2023.

Builds on

29 of 56 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 233
  2. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  3. 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 124
  4. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  5. 2018Confounding-Robust Policy Improvementcited by 76
  6. 2021Sensitivity Analysis of Individual Treatment Effects: A Robust Conformal Inference Approachcited by 62
  7. 2020Off-policy Policy Evaluation For Sequential Decisions Under Unobserved Confoundingcited by 61
  8. 2017Balanced Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 52
  9. 2019Regression Under Human Assistancecited by 40
  10. 2021Conformal Sensitivity Analysis for Individual Treatment Effectscited by 40
  11. 2018Bounds on the conditional and average treatment effect with unobserved confounding factorscited by 39
  12. 2021Human-AI Collaboration with Bandit Feedbackcited by 36
17 more
  1. 2017Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrapcited by 33
  2. 2021Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancingcited by 32
  3. 2020Sense and Sensitivity Analysis: Simple Post-Hoc Analysis of Bias Due to Unobserved Confoundingcited by 25
  4. 2019More Efficient Policy Learning via Optimal Retargetingcited by 23
  5. 2017Policy Learning with Observational Datacited by 19
  6. 2022Toward Supporting Perceptual Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration via Reflection on Unobservablescited by 19
  7. 2019Balanced off-policy evaluation in general action spacescited by 11
  8. 2022Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approachcited by 11
  9. 2023Policy Learning under Biased Sample Selectioncited by 9
  10. 2019A Case for Backward Compatibility for Human-AI Teamscited by 7
  11. 2023Learning Complementary Policies for Human-AI Teamscited by 7
  12. 2020Augmented Fairness: An Interpretable Model Augmenting Decision-Makers' Fairnesscited by 6
  13. 2021Loss Functions for Discrete Contextual Pricing with Observational Datacited by 6
  14. 2021Enhancing Counterfactual Classification via Self-Trainingcited by 5
  15. 2023Balanced Off-Policy Evaluation for Personalized Pricingcited by 5
  16. 2019Classifying Treatment Responders Under Causal Effect Monotonicitycited by 4
  17. 2022Minimax Optimal Estimation of Stability Under Distribution Shiftcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.