mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Augmented Fairness: An Interpretable Model Augmenting Decision-Makers' Fairness

arXiv 2011.08398 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2020cs.LG cs.HCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a model-agnostic approach for mitigating the prediction bias of a black-box decision-maker, and in particular, a human decision-maker. Our method detects in the feature space where the black-box decision-maker is biased and replaces it with a few short decision rules, acting as a "fair surrogate". The rule-based surrogate model is trained under two objectives, predictive performance and fairness. Our model focuses on a setting that is common in practice but distinct from other literature on fairness. We only have black-box access to the model, and only a limited set of true labels can be queried under a budget constraint. We formulate a multi-objective optimization for building a surrogate model, where we simultaneously optimize for both predictive performance and bias. To train the model, we propose a novel training algorithm that combines a nondominated sorting genetic algorithm with active learning. We test our model on public datasets where we simulate various biased "black-box" classifiers (decision-makers) and apply our approach for interpretable augmented fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.