Quantifying Agent Interaction in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cost-efficient Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generalization poses a significant challenge in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). The extent to which an agent is influenced by unseen co-players depends on the agent's policy and the specific scenario. A quantitative examination of this relationship sheds light on effectively training agents for diverse scenarios. In this study, we present the Level of Influence (LoI), a metric quantifying the interaction intensity among agents within a given scenario and environment. We observe that, generally, a more diverse set of co-play agents during training enhances the generalization performance of the ego agent; however, this improvement varies across distinct scenarios and environments. LoI proves effective in predicting these improvement disparities within specific scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce a LoI-guided resource allocation method tailored to train a set of policies for diverse scenarios under a constrained budget. Our results demonstrate that strategic resource allocation based on LoI can achieve higher performance than uniform allocation under the same computation budget.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 43 references.
References · 26
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 367
- 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 349
- 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 264
- 2020"Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 198
- 2019The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Researchcited by 197
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 168
- 2021Collaborating with Humans without Human Datacited by 142
- 2021Scalable Evaluation of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Melting Potcited by 99
14 more
- 2021DouZero: Mastering DouDizhu with Self-Play Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
- 2020Super-Human Performance in Gran Turismo Sport Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2020Social diversity and social preferences in mixed-motive reinforcement learningcited by 49
- 2022Melting Pot 2.0cited by 40
- 2021On the Importance of Environments in Human-Robot Coordinationcited by 37
- 2021On the Critical Role of Conventions in Adaptive Human-AI Collaborationcited by 27
- 2021Quantifying the effects of environment and population diversity in multi-agent reinforcement learningcited by 22
- 2019On the Utility of Model Learning in HRIcited by 21
- 2021Quasi-Equivalence Discovery for Zero-Shot Emergent Communicationcited by 19
- 2020Exploring Zero-Shot Emergent Communication in Embodied Multi-Agent Populationscited by 18
- 2022Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Drivingcited by 18
- 2023Diversifying AI: Towards Creative Chess with AlphaZerocited by 15
- 2023Minimum Coverage Sets for Training Robust Ad Hoc Teamwork Agentscited by 13
- 2019Options as responses: Grounding behavioural hierarchies in multi-agent RLcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.