Dynamic value alignment through preference aggregation of multiple objectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The development of ethical AI systems is currently geared toward setting objective functions that align with human objectives. However, finding such functions remains a research challenge, while in RL, setting rewards by hand is a fairly standard approach. We present a methodology for dynamic value alignment, where the values that are to be aligned with are dynamically changing, using a multiple-objective approach. We apply this approach to extend Deep Q-Learning to accommodate multiple objectives and evaluate this method on a simplified two-leg intersection controlled by a switching agent.Our approach dynamically accommodates the preferences of drivers on the system and achieves better overall performance across three metrics (speeds, stops, and waits) while integrating objectives that have competing or conflicting actions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.
Builds on
23 of 59 references.
References · 23
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2021Goal Misgeneralization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 123
- 2019CityFlow: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Environment for Large Scale City Traffic Scenariocited by 115
- 2021B-Pref: Benchmarking Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
- 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
- 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2022Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 81
11 more
- 2020Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 65
- 2018Incomplete Contracting and AI Alignmentcited by 62
- 2017A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Makingcited by 55
- 2022imitation: Clean Imitation Learning Implementationscited by 34
- 2021What are you optimizing for? Aligning Recommender Systems with Human Valuescited by 29
- 2018Impossibility and Uncertainty Theorems in AI Value Alignment (or why your AGI should not have a utility function)cited by 22
- 2020Value Alignment Verificationcited by 20
- 2020Multi-Principal Assistance Gamescited by 10
- 2016The Singularity May Never Be Nearcited by 4
- 2017Servant of Many Masters: Shifting priorities in Pareto-optimal sequential decision-makingcited by 2
- 2020Multi-Principal Assistance Games: Definition and Collegial Mechanismscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.