Multi-Principal Assistance Games: Definition and Collegial Mechanisms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce the concept of a multi-principal assistance game (MPAG), and circumvent an obstacle in social choice theory, Gibbard's theorem, by using a sufficiently collegial preference inference mechanism. In an MPAG, a single agent assists N human principals who may have widely different preferences. MPAGs generalize assistance games, also known as cooperative inverse reinforcement learning games. We analyze in particular a generalization of apprenticeship learning in which the humans first perform some work to obtain utility and demonstrate their preferences, and then the robot acts to further maximize the sum of human payoffs. We show in this setting that if the game is sufficiently collegial, i.e. if the humans are responsible for obtaining a sufficient fraction of the rewards through their own actions, then their preferences are straightforwardly revealed through their work. This revelation mechanism is non-dictatorial, does not limit the possible outcomes to two alternatives, and is dominant-strategy incentive-compatible.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2020Multi-Principal Assistance Games
- 2024Learning in Multi-Objective Public Goods Games with Non-Linear Utilities
- 2026Self-Referenced Social Preferences: Cooperation without Observing Others Rewards
- 2018An Efficient, Generalized Bellman Update For Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Matching Multiple Experts: On the Exploitability of Multi-Agent Imitation Learning
- 2025Everyone Contributes! Incentivizing Strategic Cooperation in Multi-LLM Systems via Sequential Public Goods Games
- 2024Pareto-Optimal Learning from Preferences with Hidden Context
- 2025Generalizing Behavior via Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Reward Centroids