mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Value Alignment Verification

arXiv 2012.01557 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2020cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As humans interact with autonomous agents to perform increasingly complicated, potentially risky tasks, it is important to be able to efficiently evaluate an agent's performance and correctness. In this paper we formalize and theoretically analyze the problem of efficient value alignment verification: how to efficiently test whether the behavior of another agent is aligned with a human's values. The goal is to construct a kind of "driver's test" that a human can give to any agent which will verify value alignment via a minimal number of queries. We study alignment verification problems with both idealized humans that have an explicit reward function as well as problems where they have implicit values. We analyze verification of exact value alignment for rational agents and propose and analyze heuristic and approximate value alignment verification tests in a wide range of gridworlds and a continuous autonomous driving domain. Finally, we prove that there exist sufficient conditions such that we can verify exact and approximate alignment across an infinite set of test environments via a constant-query-complexity alignment test.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
  2. 2022Know Your Boundaries: The Necessity of Explicit Behavioral Cloning in Offline RLcited by 21
  3. 2024High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Modelscited by 20
  4. 2022Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  5. 2024Preference Poisoning Attacks on Reward Model Learningcited by 14
  6. 2024Contextual Moral Value Alignment Through Context-Based Aggregationcited by 10
  7. 2025Towards Improving Reward Design in RL: A Reward Alignment Metric for RL Practitionerscited by 10
  8. 2021Curriculum Design for Teaching via Demonstrations: Theory and Applicationscited by 9
  9. 2023Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Modelscited by 9
  10. 2024Quantifying Misalignment Between Agents: Towards a Sociotechnical Understanding of Alignmentcited by 8
  11. 2023Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 7
  12. 2024MAPLE: A Framework for Active Preference Learning Guided by Large Language Modelscited by 6
8 more
  1. 2023Towards Regulatable AI Systems: Technical Gaps and Policy Opportunitiescited by 2
  2. 2026Any-Body Guard: Universal Safeguarding for Manipulation Policies via Action Maskingcited by 2
  3. 2023Can Differentiable Decision Trees Enable Interpretable Reward Learning from Human Feedback?cited by 0
  4. 2023Dynamic value alignment through preference aggregation of multiple objectivescited by 0
  5. 2025HKGAI-V1: Towards Regional Sovereign Large Language Model for Hong Kongcited by 0
  6. 2025Rethinking How AI Embeds and Adapts to Human Values: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 0
  7. 2026The Trajectory Alignment Coefficient in Two Acts: From Reward Tuning to Reward Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026Multi-Modal, Multi-Environment Machine Teaching for Robust Reward Learningcited by 0