mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Resprompt: Residual Connection Prompting Advances Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv 2310.04743 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, which offers step-by-step problem-solving rationales, has impressively unlocked the reasoning potential of large language models (LLMs). Yet, the standard CoT is less effective in problems demanding multiple reasoning steps. This limitation arises from the complex reasoning process in multi-step problems: later stages often depend on the results of several steps earlier, not just the results of the immediately preceding step. Such complexities suggest the reasoning process is naturally represented as a graph. The almost linear and straightforward structure of CoT prompting, however, struggles to capture this complex reasoning graph. To address this challenge, we propose Residual Connection Prompting (RESPROMPT), a new prompting strategy that advances multi-step reasoning in LLMs. Our key idea is to reconstruct the reasoning graph within prompts. We achieve this by integrating necessary connections-links present in the reasoning graph but missing in the linear CoT flow-into the prompts. Termed "residual connections", these links are pivotal in morphing the linear CoT structure into a graph representation, effectively capturing the complex reasoning graphs inherent in multi-step problems. We evaluate RESPROMPT on six benchmarks across three diverse domains: math, sequential, and commonsense reasoning. For the open-sourced LLaMA family of models, RESPROMPT yields a significant average reasoning accuracy improvement of 12.5% on LLaMA-65B and 6.8% on LLaMA2-70B. Breakdown analysis further highlights RESPROMPT particularly excels in complex multi-step reasoning: for questions demanding at least five reasoning steps, RESPROMPT outperforms the best CoT based benchmarks by a remarkable average improvement of 21.1% on LLaMA-65B and 14.3% on LLaMA2-70B. Through extensive ablation studies and analyses, we pinpoint how to most effectively build residual connections.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 50 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.

Builds on

50 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models18 Aug
  2. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters20 Dec
  3. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them17 Oct
  4. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models7 Oct
  5. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning3 Oct
  6. 2022Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango16 Sep
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners24 May
  8. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models21 May
  9. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
  10. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan

Other references · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  9. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  10. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  11. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  12. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
28 more
  1. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  2. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  4. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  5. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  6. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  7. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  8. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  9. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  10. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  11. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  12. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  13. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  14. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  15. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 837
  16. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  17. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
  18. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  19. 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
  20. 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 554
  21. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
  22. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  23. 2023Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 249
  24. 2023Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thoughtcited by 218
  25. 2023Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasonerscited by 63
  26. 2022Learning Math Reasoning from Self-Sampled Correct and Partially-Correct Solutionscited by 38
  27. 2016Simpler Context-Dependent Logical Forms via Model Projectionscited by 33
  28. 2023STREET: A Multi-Task Structured Reasoning and Explanation Benchmarkcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns
  2. 2024ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting
  3. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models
  4. 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
  5. 2026Beyond the Prompt in Large Language Models: Comprehension, In-Context Learning, and Chain-of-Thought
  6. 2024Break the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut Reasoners
  7. 2023R3 Prompting: Review, Rephrase and Resolve for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models under Noisy Context
  8. 2025Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLM