R3 Prompting: Review, Rephrase and Resolve for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models under Noisy Context
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
With the help of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various reasoning tasks. However, most of them have been evaluated under noise-free context and the dilemma for LLMs to produce inaccurate results under the noisy context has not been fully investigated. Existing studies utilize trigger sentences to encourage LLMs to concentrate on the relevant information but the trigger has limited effect on final answer prediction. Inspired by interactive CoT method, where intermediate reasoning steps are promoted by multiple rounds of interaction between users and LLMs, we propose a novel prompting method, namely R3 prompting, for CoT reasoning under noisy context. Specifically, R3 prompting interacts with LLMs to perform key sentence extraction, variable declaration and answer prediction, which corresponds to a thought process of reviewing, rephrasing and resolving. The responses generated at the last interaction will perform as hints to guide toward the responses of the next interaction. Our experiments show that R3 prompting significantly outperforms existing CoT prompting methods on five reasoning tasks under noisy context. With GPT-3.5-turbo, we observe 3.7% accuracy improvement on average on the reasoning tasks under noisy context compared to the most competitive prompting baseline. More analyses and ablation studies show the robustness and generalization of R3 prompting method in solving reasoning tasks in LLMs under noisy context.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
22 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models6 May
- 2023Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models19 Apr
- 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification19 Dec
- 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models7 Oct
- 2022Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango16 Sep
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners24 May
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models21 May
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan
Other references · 13
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
- 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 353
- 2022Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoningcited by 331
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 324
- 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 231
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problemscited by 31
- 2024Unsupervised Text Style Transfer via LLMs and Attention Masking with Multi-way Interactionscited by 7
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trendscited by 3
- 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problems23 Apr 2024
- 2024Unsupervised Text Style Transfer via LLMs and Attention Masking with Multi-way Interactions21 Feb 2024
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends15 Jan 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns
- 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters
- 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
- 2024ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- 2024Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
- 2023Resprompt: Residual Connection Prompting Advances Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2023Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models
- 2023Towards Better Chain-of-Thought Prompting Strategies: A Survey