DCR: Divide-and-Conquer Reasoning for Multi-choice Question Answering with LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in reasoning benchmarks with the emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT), particularly in multi-choice question (MCQ). However, current works equally resolve questions regardless of the problem-solving difficulty, leading to an excessive focus on simple items while insufficient attention on intricate ones. To address this challenge, we propose a simple yet effective strategy, Divide and Conquer Reasoning (DCR), to enhance the reasoning capability of LLMs for MCQs, as inspired by human beings using heuristics to first categorize tasks and then handle them separately. In particular, we first categorize questions into two subsets based on confidence score (CS), which is estimated by statistical frequency of generated answers. Subsequently, we propose Filter Choices based Reasoning (FCR) to improve model performance on MCQs with low (CS). Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed strategy only costs 85% of SOTA, while still achieves average accuracy improvement of 1.56% across nine datasets including arithmetic, commonsense, and logic reasoning tasks. The code is at urlhttps://github.com/AiMijie/Divide-and-Conquer
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 54 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.
Builds on
54 of 73 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Agent Instructs Large Language Models to be General Zero-Shot Reasoners5 Oct
- 2023Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models5 Oct
- 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting15 Aug
- 2023Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning6 Jun
- 2023ChatCoT: Tool-Augmented Chain-of-Thought Reasoning on Chat-based Large Language Models23 May
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models27 Feb
Other references · 47
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
35 more
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Modelscited by 684
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
- 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 199
- 2023SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 157
- 2023Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2023Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Modelscited by 154
- 2023Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 147
- 2023Automatic Prompt Augmentation and Selection with Chain-of-Thought from Labeled Datacited by 119
- 2023Large Language Models as Analogical Reasonerscited by 107
- 2023Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2023Large Language Models can Learn Rulescited by 66
- 2021RiddleSense: Reasoning about Riddle Questions Featuring Linguistic Creativity and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 60
- 2023RCOT: Detecting and Rectifying Factual Inconsistency in Reasoning by Reversing Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 47
- 2023Benchmarking and Improving Generator-Validator Consistency of Language Modelscited by 43
- 2023Tab-CoT: Zero-shot Tabular Chain of Thoughtcited by 42
- 2023Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2023LPML: LLM-Prompting Markup Language for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 15
- 2023EchoPrompt: Instructing the Model to Rephrase Queries for Improved In-context Learningcited by 13
- 2023Design of Chain-of-Thought in Math Problem Solvingcited by 12
- 2023Are Human-generated Demonstrations Necessary for In-context Learning?cited by 11
- 2023Generalizable Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Mixed-task Scenarios with Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2023Fill in the Blank: Exploring and Enhancing LLM Capabilities for Backward Reasoning in Math Word Problemscited by 9
- 2023Resprompt: Residual Connection Prompting Advances Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspectioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 182
- 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Modelscited by 104
- 2025ShorterBetter: Guiding Reasoning Models to Find Optimal Inference Length for Efficient Reasoningcited by 70
- 2024Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 25
- 2025Reasoning Can Hurt the Inductive Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Reasoning Can Hurt the Inductive Abilities of Large Language Models30 May 2025
- 2025ShorterBetter: Guiding Reasoning Models to Find Optimal Inference Length for Efficient Reasoning30 Apr 2025
- 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs11 Feb 2025
- 2024Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting30 Sep 2024
- 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models7 Feb 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reasoning Models are Test Exploiters: Rethinking Multiple-Choice
- 2025More Bias, Less Bias: BiasPrompting for Enhanced Multiple-Choice Question Answering
- 2026Exploring the Meta-level Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Tool-based Multi-hop Tabular Question Answering Task
- 2023Reverse Multi-Choice Dialogue Commonsense Inference with Graph-of-Thought
- 2024MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Tail Knowledge
- 2025SQuARE: Sequential Question Answering Reasoning Engine for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models
- 2024CLR-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models in College-level Reasoning
- 2025Test-Time Reasoners Are Strategic Multiple-Choice Test-Takers