mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species -- insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge

arXiv 2309.15589 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization devices, or specimens are produced in different laboratories. This observation motivated the inception of the 2022 challenge on MItosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG 2022). The challenge provided annotated histologic tumor images from six different domains and evaluated the algorithmic approaches for mitotic figure detection provided by nine challenge participants on ten independent domains. Ground truth for mitotic figure detection was established in two ways: a three-expert consensus and an independent, immunohistochemistry-assisted set of labels. This work represents an overview of the challenge tasks, the algorithmic strategies employed by the participants, and potential factors contributing to their success. With an F1 score of 0.764 for the top-performing team, we summarize that domain generalization across various tumor domains is possible with today's deep learning-based recognition pipelines. However, we also found that domain characteristics not present in the training set (feline as new species, spindle cell shape as new morphology and a new scanner) led to small but significant decreases in performance. When assessed against the immunohistochemistry-assisted reference standard, all methods resulted in reduced recall scores, but with only minor changes in the order of participants in the ranking.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.

Builds on

25 of 85 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  6. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  7. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
  8. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
  9. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,020
  10. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
  11. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 388
  12. 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challengecited by 67
13 more
  1. 2018Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: the TUPAC16 challengecited by 61
  2. 2018Whole-Slide Mitosis Detection in H&E Breast Histology Using PHH3 as a Reference to Train Distilled Stain-Invariant Convolutional Networkscited by 57
  3. 2020NuClick: A Deep Learning Framework for Interactive Segmentation of Microscopy Imagescited by 46
  4. 2021Balanced-MixUp for Highly Imbalanced Medical Image Classificationcited by 46
  5. 2023Why is the winner the best?cited by 21
  6. 2014Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology imagescited by 16
  7. 2020EXACT: A collaboration toolset for algorithm-aided annotation of images with annotation version controlcited by 16
  8. 2021Quantifying the Scanner-Induced Domain Gap in Mitosis Detectioncited by 16
  9. 2020Are pathologist-defined labels reproducible? Comparison of the TUPAC16 mitotic figure dataset with an alternative set of labelscited by 12
  10. 2021Robust Interactive Semantic Segmentation of Pathology Images with Minimal User Inputcited by 8
  11. 2022Detecting Mitoses with a Convolutional Neural Network for MIDOG 2022 Challengecited by 5
  12. 2023Fine-Grained Hard Negative Mining: Generalizing Mitosis Detection with a Fifth of the MIDOG 2022 Datasetcited by 3
  13. 2022Radial Prediction Domain Adaption Classifier for the MIDOG 2022 Challengecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 14; 2026: 4.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflowcited by 73
  2. 2024CPath-Omni: A Unified Multimodal Foundation Model for Patch and Whole Slide Image Analysis in Computational Pathologycited by 34
  3. 2025Histologic Dataset of Normal and Atypical Mitotic Figures on Human Breast Cancer (AMi-Br)cited by 17
  4. 2025A Versatile Pathology Co-pilot via Reasoning Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 12
  5. 2025Benchmarking Deep Learning and Vision Foundation Models for Atypical vs. Normal Mitosis Classification with Cross-Dataset Evaluationcited by 7
  6. 2024OMG-Net: A Deep Learning Framework Deploying Segment Anything to Detect Pan-Cancer Mitotic Figures from Haematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Slidescited by 4
  7. 2024Benchmarking Domain Generalization Algorithms in Computational Pathologycited by 3
  8. 2025From Traditional to Deep Learning Approaches in Whole Slide Image Registration: A Methodological Reviewcited by 2
  9. 2025Benchmarking Foundation Models for Mitotic Figure Classificationcited by 2
  10. 2025Efficient Fine-Tuning of DINOv3 Pretrained on Natural Images for Atypical Mitotic Figure Classificationcited by 2
  11. 2025Towards Cellular-Scale Interpretability in Pathology Foundation Models for Biomarker Assessmentcited by 2
  12. 2024On the Value of PHH3 for Mitotic Figure Detection on H&E-stained Imagescited by 1
13 more
  1. 2025Z-Stack Scanning can Improve AI Detection of Mitosis: A Case Study of Meningiomascited by 1
  2. 2025A Unified Low-level Foundation Model for Enhancing Pathology Image Qualitycited by 1
  3. 2026A Deployment-Friendly Foundational Framework for Efficient Computational Pathologycited by 1
  4. 2024Cross-Organ and Cross-Scanner Adenocarcinoma Segmentation using Rein to Fine-tune Vision Foundation Modelscited by 0
  5. 2024Cross-Task Pretraining for Cross-Organ Cross-Scanner Adenocarcinoma Segmentationcited by 0
  6. 2024Is Self-Supervision Enough? Benchmarking Foundation Models Against End-to-End Training for Mitotic Figure Classificationcited by 0
  7. 2025Automated Classification of Normal and Atypical Mitotic Figures Using ConvNeXt V2: MIDOG 2025 Track 2cited by 0
  8. 2025Mix, Align, Distil: Reliable Cross-Domain Atypical Mitosis Classificationcited by 0
  9. 2025Sequential Hard Mining: a data-centric approach for Mitosis Detectioncited by 0
  10. 2025Team Westwood Solution for MIDOG 2025 Challenge: An Ensemble-CNN-Based Approach For Mitosis Detection And Classificationcited by 0
  11. 2026Free Lunch in Medical Image Foundation Model Pre-training via Randomized Synthesis and Disentanglementcited by 0
  12. 2026Beyond Classification: Pathology Foundation Models as Detection Encoders for Mitotic Figurescited by 0
  13. 2026MiTHras: Task-specific Hierarchical Semi-supervised Contrastive Masked Autoencoder for Mitotic Figure Analysiscited by 0