mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Deep Learning and Vision Foundation Models for Atypical vs. Normal Mitosis Classification with Cross-Dataset Evaluation

arXiv 2506.21444 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Atypical mitosis marks a deviation in the cell division process that has been shown be an independent prognostic marker for tumor malignancy. However, atypical mitosis classification remains challenging due to low prevalence, at times subtle morphological differences from normal mitotic figures, low inter-rater agreement among pathologists, and class imbalance in datasets. Building on the Atypical Mitosis dataset for Breast Cancer (AMi-Br), this study presents a comprehensive benchmark comparing deep learning approaches for automated atypical mitotic figure (AMF) classification, including end-to-end trained deep learning models, foundation models with linear probing, and foundation models fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation (LoRA). For rigorous evaluation, we further introduce two new held-out AMF datasets - AtNorM-Br, a dataset of mitotic figures from the TCGA breast cancer cohort, and AtNorM-MD, a multi-domain dataset of mitotic figures from a subset of the MIDOG++ training set. We found average balanced accuracy values of up to 0.8135, 0.7788, and 0.7723 on the in-domain AMi-Br and the out-of-domain AtNorm-Br and AtNorM-MD datasets, respectively. Our work shows that atypical mitotic figure classification, while being a challenging problem, can be effectively addressed through the use of recent advances in transfer learning and model fine-tuning techniques. We make all code and data used in this paper available in this github repository: https://github.com/DeepMicroscopy/AMi-Br_Benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  5. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  6. 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
  7. 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challengecited by 67
  8. 2024A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 66
  9. 2018Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: the TUPAC16 challengecited by 61
  10. 2025Distilling foundation models for robust and efficient models in digital pathologycited by 36
  11. 2023Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species -- insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challengecited by 25
  12. 2025Histologic Dataset of Normal and Atypical Mitotic Figures on Human Breast Cancer (AMi-Br)cited by 17
4 more
  1. 2021Quantifying the Scanner-Induced Domain Gap in Mitosis Detectioncited by 16
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Evaluation of Histopathology Foundation Models for Ovarian Cancer Subtype Classificationcited by 13
  3. 2020Are pathologist-defined labels reproducible? Comparison of the TUPAC16 mitotic figure dataset with an alternative set of labelscited by 12
  4. 2022Deep learning-based Subtyping of Atypical and Normal Mitoses using a Hierarchical Anchor-Free Object Detectorcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

7 papers.