Beyond Classification: Pathology Foundation Models as Detection Encoders for Mitotic Figures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pathology foundation models (FMs) are models trained on vast amounts of typically unlabeled data and have been shown to yield regularized latent spaces that can be used effectively in downstream classification tasks. This is also true for the classification of mitotic figures vs. other cells. However, it is so far unclear if the latent space of current FMs provides features that are discriminant and spatially suitably resolved to also serve as a backbone for dense object detection paradigms. In this work, we investigate this question for common current pathology FMs (UNI, UNI2-h, Virchow, Virchow2, H-optimus-0, H-optimus-1) and compare their performance against a fully end-to-end trained baseline based on a ResNet50 architecture. We combine FM backbones with representatives of single stage, dual stage and self-attention-based detectors (RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN, Deformable DETR respectively) on the multi-domain MIDOG++ dataset, and on the TUPAC16 dataset as an out-of-domain case. We show that the H-optimus-0 and Virchow models yielded competitive performance, indicating that the latent spaces of current FMs, all trained on image-level self-supervision, are suitable for direct mitotic figure detection and may be slightly more robust on our out-of-domain test case. All code is made available publicly at https://github.com/DeepMicroscopy/FM4MFdet.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 723
- 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 144
- 2023CellViT: Vision Transformers for Precise Cell Segmentation and Classificationcited by 108
- 2024A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 64
- 2018Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: the TUPAC16 challengecited by 61
8 more
- 2024Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathologycited by 47
- 2023Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species -- insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challengecited by 25
- 2025CellViT++: Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Cell Segmentation and Classification Using Foundation Modelscited by 20
- 2020Are pathologist-defined labels reproducible? Comparison of the TUPAC16 mitotic figure dataset with an alternative set of labelscited by 12
- 2025Benchmarking Deep Learning and Vision Foundation Models for Atypical vs. Normal Mitosis Classification with Cross-Dataset Evaluationcited by 7
- 2025Benchmarking Foundation Models for Mitotic Figure Classificationcited by 2
- 2026To What Extent Do Token-Level Representations from Pathology Foundation Models Improve Dense Prediction?cited by 1
- 2026Mitosis Detection in the Wild: Multi-Tumor and Context-Aware Generalization in the MIDOG 2025 Challengecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.