Estimation of Counterfactual Interventions under Uncertainties
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual analysis is intuitively performed by humans on a daily basis eg. "What should I have done differently to get the loan approved?". Such counterfactual questions also steer the formulation of scientific hypotheses. More formally it provides insights about potential improvements of a system by inferring the effects of hypothetical interventions into a past observation of the system's behaviour which plays a prominent role in a variety of industrial applications. Due to the hypothetical nature of such analysis, counterfactual distributions are inherently ambiguous. This ambiguity is particularly challenging in continuous settings in which a continuum of explanations exist for the same observation. In this paper, we address this problem by following a hierarchical Bayesian approach which explicitly models such uncertainty. In particular, we derive counterfactual distributions for a Bayesian Warped Gaussian Process thereby allowing for non-Gaussian distributions and non-additive noise. We illustrate the properties our approach on a synthetic and on a semi-synthetic example and show its performance when used within an algorithmic recourse downstream task.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 379
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2020Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inferencecited by 210
- 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 139
- 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 114
15 more
- 2021DiBS: Differentiable Bayesian Structure Learningcited by 105
- 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
- 2022Deep End-to-end Causal Inferencecited by 93
- 2018Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Counterfactually-Guided Policy Searchcited by 81
- 2019Causal structure based root cause analysis of outlierscited by 65
- 2021Partial Counterfactual Identification from Observational and Experimental Datacited by 64
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recoursecited by 56
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2020Invertible Generative Modeling using Linear Rational Splinescited by 39
- 2021Counterfactual Explanations in Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertaintycited by 36
- 2020Transforming Gaussian Processes With Normalizing Flowscited by 28
- 2020Representational aspects of depth and conditioning in normalizing flowscited by 25
- 2022Counterfactual Plans under Distributional Ambiguitycited by 19
- 2019Optimal experimental design via Bayesian optimization: active causal structure learning for Gaussian process networkscited by 18
- 2021A Causal Perspective on Meaningful and Robust Algorithmic Recoursecited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.