mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Efficient Training with Negative Samples in Visual Tracking

arXiv 2309.02903 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in visual object tracking often require extensive computational resources and vast amounts of training data, leading to a risk of overfitting. This study introduces a more efficient training strategy to mitigate overfitting and reduce computational requirements. We balance the training process with a mix of negative and positive samples from the outset, named as Joint learning with Negative samples (JN). Negative samples refer to scenarios where the object from the template is not present in the search region, which helps to prevent the model from simply memorizing the target, and instead encourages it to use the template for object location. To handle the negative samples effectively, we adopt a distribution-based head, which modeling the bounding box as distribution of distances to express uncertainty about the target's location in the presence of negative samples, offering an efficient way to manage the mixed sample training. Furthermore, our approach introduces a target-indicating token. It encapsulates the target's precise location within the template image. This method provides exact boundary details with negligible computational cost but improving performance. Our model, JN-256, exhibits superior performance on challenging benchmarks, achieving 75.8% AO on GOT-10k and 84.1% AUC on TrackingNet. Notably, JN-256 outperforms previous SOTA trackers that utilize larger models and higher input resolutions, even though it is trained with only half the number of data sampled used in those works.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.

Builds on

35 of 40 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  4. 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,368
  5. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
  6. 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 568
  7. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 540
  8. 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 475
  9. 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
  10. 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
  11. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 409
  12. 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Trackingcited by 350
23 more
  1. 2018TrackingNet: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 343
  2. 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Frameworkcited by 330
  3. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  4. 2022MixFormer: End-to-End Tracking with Iterative Mixed Attentioncited by 281
  5. 2021Transformer Meets Tracker: Exploiting Temporal Context for Robust Visual Trackingcited by 220
  6. 2020Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Trackingcited by 212
  7. 2023Universal Instance Perception as Object Discovery and Retrievalcited by 192
  8. 2019Siam R-CNN: Visual Tracking by Re-Detectioncited by 174
  9. 2022AiATrack: Attention in Attention for Transformer Visual Trackingcited by 137
  10. 2021Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Trackcited by 131
  11. 2021SwinTrack: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Transformer Trackingcited by 126
  12. 2022Backbone is All Your Need: A Simplified Architecture for Visual Object Trackingcited by 119
  13. 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
  14. 2022Towards Grand Unification of Object Trackingcited by 93
  15. 2023Generalized Relation Modeling for Transformer Trackingcited by 93
  16. 2021STMTrack: Template-free Visual Tracking with Space-time Memory Networkscited by 91
  17. 2020Alpha-Refine: Boosting Tracking Performance by Precise Bounding Box Estimationcited by 81
  18. 2022Transformer Tracking with Cyclic Shifting Window Attentioncited by 75
  19. 2021Do Different Tracking Tasks Require Different Appearance Models?cited by 62
  20. 2023Target-Aware Tracking with Long-term Context Attentioncited by 27
  21. 2020RPT: Learning Point Set Representation for Siamese Visual Trackingcited by 26
  22. 2023Unified Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for Single- and Multi-Modal Visual Object Trackingcited by 21
  23. 2022Learning Spatial-Frequency Transformer for Visual Object Trackingcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.