mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concentrated Differential Privacy for Bandits

arXiv 2309.00557 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2023stat.ML cs.CR cs.ITcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bandits serve as the theoretical foundation of sequential learning and an algorithmic foundation of modern recommender systems. However, recommender systems often rely on user-sensitive data, making privacy a critical concern. This paper contributes to the understanding of Differential Privacy (DP) in bandits with a trusted centralised decision-maker, and especially the implications of ensuring zero Concentrated Differential Privacy (zCDP). First, we formalise and compare different adaptations of DP to bandits, depending on the considered input and the interaction protocol. Then, we propose three private algorithms, namely AdaC-UCB, AdaC-GOPE and AdaC-OFUL, for three bandit settings, namely finite-armed bandits, linear bandits, and linear contextual bandits. The three algorithms share a generic algorithmic blueprint, i.e. the Gaussian mechanism and adaptive episodes, to ensure a good privacy-utility trade-off. We analyse and upper bound the regret of these three algorithms. Our analysis shows that in all of these settings, the prices of imposing zCDP are (asymptotically) negligible in comparison with the regrets incurred oblivious to privacy. Next, we complement our regret upper bounds with the first minimax lower bounds on the regret of bandits with zCDP. To prove the lower bounds, we elaborate a new proof technique based on couplings and optimal transport. We conclude by experimentally validating our theoretical results for the three different settings of bandits.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2023.

Builds on

24 of 43 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
  2. 2017Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervalscited by 103
  3. 2014Online Clustering of Banditscited by 99
  4. 2018Differentially Private Contextual Linear Banditscited by 82
  5. 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 81
  6. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
  7. 2015Algorithms for Differentially Private Multi-Armed Banditscited by 44
  8. 2019An Optimal Private Stochastic-MAB Algorithm Based on an Optimal Private Stopping Rulecited by 37
  9. 2021The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual Observationcited by 32
  10. 2022New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemmacited by 32
  11. 2022When Privacy Meets Partial Information: A Refined Analysis of Differentially Private Banditscited by 28
  12. 2019Differential Privacy for Multi-armed Bandits: What Is It and What Is Its Cost?cited by 27
12 more
  1. 2017Achieving Privacy in the Adversarial Multi-Armed Banditcited by 24
  2. 2018Mitigating Bias in Adaptive Data Gathering via Differential Privacycited by 21
  3. 2022Differentially Private Stochastic Linear Bandits: (Almost) for Freecited by 19
  4. 2021Design of Experiments for Stochastic Contextual Linear Banditscited by 18
  5. 2018Simple Regret Minimization for Contextual Banditscited by 16
  6. 2022Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 16
  7. 2021Concurrent Composition of Differential Privacycited by 12
  8. 2017Instrument-Armed Banditscited by 10
  9. 2022Composition Theorems for Interactive Differential Privacycited by 10
  10. 2022Differentially Private Linear Bandits with Partial Distributed Feedbackcited by 8
  11. 2022On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraintscited by 6
  12. 2018Thompson Sampling for Noncompliant Banditscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.