Minimax Quantile Lower Bounds for Interactive Statistical Decision Making with Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Minimax risk and regret are expectation-based criteria and do not capture rare but consequential failures. To address this concern, we develop a δ-explicit minimax-quantile theory for interactive statistical decision making (ISDM). We first provide structural relations between minimax quantiles, lower minimax quantiles, and minimax risk. This includes a quantile-to-expectation conversion and an equivalence between strict and lower minimax quantiles outside a countable set of confidence levels. We then derive two converse tools for ISDM: a high-probability interactive Fano's method and a high-probability interactive Le Cam's method. Then, we show that mutual-information (MI) privacy can be handled in the same framework by restricting the admissible decision class. For coordinatewise Gaussian privatization, we derive a two-point template that isolates the privacy-induced variance inflation. We instantiate this template for Gaussian mean estimation, and use the same two-point strategy directly for two-armed Gaussian bandits. We then derive a minimax quantile lower bound for the K-armed Gaussian bandit problem, showing that the interactive Fano method captures the exploration cost over multiple possible best arms. The resulting lower bounds are explicit in the confidence level δ and in the privacy budget for the private problems. They yield log(1/δ)/n scaling for squared-error Gaussian mean estimation, √Tlog(1/δ) scaling for two-armed bounded-mean Gaussian bandits, and √KTlog(1/δ)-type scaling for the K-armed bandits, with privacy appearing through a Gaussian variance-inflation factor for the private problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
16 of 33 references.
References · 16
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 218
- 2015Algorithms for Differentially Private Multi-Armed Banditscited by 45
- 2020Multi-Armed Bandits with Local Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2019Differential Privacy for Multi-armed Bandits: What Is It and What Is Its Cost?cited by 27
- 2021Optimal Rates of (Locally) Differentially Private Heavy-tailed Multi-Armed Banditscited by 25
- 2024High-probability minimax lower boundscited by 13
- 2024Assouad, Fano, and Le Cam with Interaction: A Unifying Lower Bound Framework and Characterization for Bandit Learnabilitycited by 12
- 2023Concentrated Differential Privacy for Banditscited by 10
- 2015Information Extraction Under Privacy Constraintscited by 9
- 2025Decision Making in Changing Environments: Robustness, Query-Based Learning, and Differential Privacycited by 4
4 more
- 2025Risk level dependent Minimax Quantile lower bounds for Interactive Statistical Decision Makingcited by 2
- 2020The Privacy Funnel from the viewpoint of Local Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2025High-Probability Bounds For Heterogeneous Local Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2026Unified Framework of Distributional Regret in Multi-Armed Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.