CRIMED: Lower and Upper Bounds on Regret for Bandits with Unbounded Stochastic Corruption
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the regret-minimisation problem in a multi-armed bandit setting with arbitrary corruptions. Similar to the classical setup, the agent receives rewards generated independently from the distribution of the arm chosen at each time. However, these rewards are not directly observed. Instead, with a fixed varepsilon∈ (0,frac12), the agent observes a sample from the chosen arm's distribution with probability 1-varepsilon, or from an arbitrary corruption distribution with probability varepsilon. Importantly, we impose no assumptions on these corruption distributions, which can be unbounded. In this setting, accommodating potentially unbounded corruptions, we establish a problem-dependent lower bound on regret for a given family of arm distributions. We introduce CRIMED, an asymptotically-optimal algorithm that achieves the exact lower bound on regret for bandits with Gaussian distributions with known variance. Additionally, we provide a finite-sample analysis of CRIMED's regret performance. Notably, CRIMED can effectively handle corruptions with varepsilon values as high as frac12. Furthermore, we develop a tight concentration result for medians in the presence of arbitrary corruptions, even with varepsilon values up to frac12, which may be of independent interest. We also discuss an extension of the algorithm for handling misspecification in Gaussian model.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.
Builds on
25 of 64 references.
References · 25
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 133
- 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
- 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
- 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
- 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
- 2016Learning from Untrusted Datacited by 90
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
- 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 56
- 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
- 2019SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Pythoncited by 49
13 more
- 2015Robust Covariance and Scatter Matrix Estimation under Huber's Contamination Modelcited by 47
- 2017An Improved Parametrization and Analysis of the EXP3++ Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 43
- 2017Misspecified Linear Banditscited by 41
- 2017Robustly Learning a Gaussian: Getting Optimal Error, Efficientlycited by 39
- 2020Tightening Exploration in Upper Confidence Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2021Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Banditscited by 24
- 2018Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Banditscited by 23
- 2020Learning Product Rankings Robust to Fake Userscited by 12
- 2023Concentrated Differential Privacy for Banditscited by 10
- 2020Quantile Multi-Armed Bandits: Optimal Best-Arm Identification and a Differentially Private Schemecited by 9
- 2023Huber-Robust Confidence Sequencescited by 7
- 2021Mean-based Best Arm Identification in Stochastic Bandits under Reward Contaminationcited by 6
- 2022Bandits Corrupted by Nature: Lower Bounds on Regret and Robust Optimistic Algorithmcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.