mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Classification robustness to common optical aberrations

arXiv 2308.15499 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer vision using deep neural networks (DNNs) has brought about seminal changes in people's lives. Applications range from automotive, face recognition in the security industry, to industrial process monitoring. In some cases, DNNs infer even in safety-critical situations. Therefore, for practical applications, DNNs have to behave in a robust way to disturbances such as noise, pixelation, or blur. Blur directly impacts the performance of DNNs, which are often approximated as a disk-shaped kernel to model defocus. However, optics suggests that there are different kernel shapes depending on wavelength and location caused by optical aberrations. In practice, as the optical quality of a lens decreases, such aberrations increase. This paper proposes OpticsBench, a benchmark for investigating robustness to realistic, practically relevant optical blur effects. Each corruption represents an optical aberration (coma, astigmatism, spherical, trefoil) derived from Zernike Polynomials. Experiments on ImageNet show that for a variety of different pre-trained DNNs, the performance varies strongly compared to disk-shaped kernels, indicating the necessity of considering realistic image degradations. In addition, we show on ImageNet-100 with OpticsAugment that robustness can be increased by using optical kernels as data augmentation. Compared to a conventionally trained ResNeXt50, training with OpticsAugment achieves an average performance gain of 21.7% points on OpticsBench and 6.8% points on 2D common corruptions.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.

Builds on

35 of 66 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  9. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  12. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
23 more
  1. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
  2. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  3. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  4. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  5. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  7. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  8. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  9. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  10. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  11. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  12. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  13. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  14. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  15. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  16. 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
  17. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112
  18. 2016Examining the Impact of Blur on Recognition by Convolutional Networkscited by 58
  19. 2021Improving robustness against common corruptions with frequency biased modelscited by 34
  20. 2022ImageNet-Patch: A Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Robustness against Adversarial Patchescited by 27
  21. 2018Deep Nets: What have they ever done for Vision?cited by 23
  22. 2022NoisyMix: Boosting Model Robustness to Common Corruptionscited by 17
  23. 2021Is RobustBench/AutoAttack a suitable Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness?cited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort: