mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Examining the Impact of Optical Aberrations to Image Classification and Object Detection Models

arXiv 2504.18510 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have proven to be successful in various computer vision applications such that models even infer in safety-critical situations. Therefore, vision models have to behave in a robust way to disturbances such as noise or blur. While seminal benchmarks exist to evaluate model robustness to diverse corruptions, blur is often approximated in an overly simplistic way to model defocus, while ignoring the different blur kernel shapes that result from optical systems. To study model robustness against realistic optical blur effects, this paper proposes two datasets of blur corruptions, which we denote OpticsBench and LensCorruptions. OpticsBench examines primary aberrations such as coma, defocus, and astigmatism, i.e. aberrations that can be represented by varying a single parameter of Zernike polynomials. To go beyond the principled but synthetic setting of primary aberrations, LensCorruptions samples linear combinations in the vector space spanned by Zernike polynomials, corresponding to 100 real lenses. Evaluations for image classification and object detection on ImageNet and MSCOCO show that for a variety of different pre-trained models, the performance on OpticsBench and LensCorruptions varies significantly, indicating the need to consider realistic image corruptions to evaluate a model's robustness against blur.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.

Builds on

61 of 114 references.

References · 61

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  10. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  11. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  12. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
38 more
  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  5. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  6. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  7. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  9. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  11. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  12. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  13. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  14. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
  15. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  16. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  17. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  18. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  19. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  20. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
  21. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  22. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  23. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  24. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  25. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  26. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  27. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  28. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  29. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  30. 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 498
  31. 2019Hybrid Task Cascade for Instance Segmentationcited by 479
  32. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
  33. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  34. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  35. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  36. 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
  37. 2020TIDE: A General Toolbox for Identifying Object Detection Errorscited by 113
  38. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.