Examining the Impact of Optical Aberrations to Image Classification and Object Detection Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have proven to be successful in various computer vision applications such that models even infer in safety-critical situations. Therefore, vision models have to behave in a robust way to disturbances such as noise or blur. While seminal benchmarks exist to evaluate model robustness to diverse corruptions, blur is often approximated in an overly simplistic way to model defocus, while ignoring the different blur kernel shapes that result from optical systems. To study model robustness against realistic optical blur effects, this paper proposes two datasets of blur corruptions, which we denote OpticsBench and LensCorruptions. OpticsBench examines primary aberrations such as coma, defocus, and astigmatism, i.e. aberrations that can be represented by varying a single parameter of Zernike polynomials. To go beyond the principled but synthetic setting of primary aberrations, LensCorruptions samples linear combinations in the vector space spanned by Zernike polynomials, corresponding to 100 real lenses. Evaluations for image classification and object detection on ImageNet and MSCOCO show that for a variety of different pre-trained models, the performance on OpticsBench and LensCorruptions varies significantly, indicating the need to consider realistic image corruptions to evaluate a model's robustness against blur.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.
Builds on
61 of 114 references.
References · 61
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
38 more
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 498
- 2019Hybrid Task Cascade for Instance Segmentationcited by 479
- 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
- 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
- 2020TIDE: A General Toolbox for Identifying Object Detection Errorscited by 113
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112
50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.