How Do Training Methods Influence the Utilization of Vision Models?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Not all learnable parameters (e.g., weights) contribute equally to a neural network's decision function. In fact, entire layers' parameters can sometimes be reset to random values with little to no impact on the model's decisions. We revisit earlier studies that examined how architecture and task complexity influence this phenomenon and ask: is this phenomenon also affected by how we train the model? We conducted experimental evaluations on a diverse set of ImageNet-1k classification models to explore this, keeping the architecture and training data constant but varying the training pipeline. Our findings reveal that the training method strongly influences which layers become critical to the decision function for a given task. For example, improved training regimes and self-supervised training increase the importance of early layers while significantly under-utilizing deeper layers. In contrast, methods such as adversarial training display an opposite trend. Our preliminary results extend previous findings, offering a more nuanced understanding of the inner mechanics of neural networks. Code: https://github.com/paulgavrikov/layer_criticality
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.
Builds on
47 of 62 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
35 more
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
- 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2021PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measurescited by 131
- 2019Are All Layers Created Equal?cited by 94
- 2020Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistencycited by 78
- 2020Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Trainingcited by 76
- 2023Intriguing properties of generative classifierscited by 52
- 2019The intriguing role of module criticality in the generalization of deep networkscited by 40
- 2021PRIME: A few primitives can boost robustness to common corruptionscited by 40
- 2022FrequencyLowCut Pooling -- Plug & Play against Catastrophic Overfittingcited by 28
- 2023CosPGD: an efficient white-box adversarial attack for pixel-wise prediction taskscited by 27
- 2022Robust Models are less Over-Confidentcited by 25
- 2024Can We Talk Models Into Seeing the World Differently?cited by 23
- 2022CNN Filter DB: An Empirical Investigation of Trained Convolutional Filterscited by 20
- 2024Can Biases in ImageNet Models Explain Generalization?cited by 20
- 2022NoisyMix: Boosting Model Robustness to Common Corruptionscited by 17
- 2023Classification robustness to common optical aberrationscited by 13
- 2023On the unreasonable vulnerability of transformers for image restoration -- and an easy fixcited by 11
- 2022Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Convolutional Filterscited by 9
- 2023An Extended Study of Human-like Behavior under Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
- 2023Improving Feature Stability during Upsampling -- Spectral Artifacts and the Importance of Spatial Contextcited by 8
- 2024Beware of Aliases -- Signal Preservation is Crucial for Robust Image Restorationcited by 6
- 2023The Power of Linear Combinations: Learning with Random Convolutionscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.