mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes

arXiv 2308.12304 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2023stat.ML cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We characterize learnability for quantum measurement classes by establishing matching necessary and sufficient conditions for their PAC learnability, along with corresponding sample complexity bounds, in the setting where the learner is given access only to prepared quantum states. We first probe the results from previous works on this setting. We show that the empirical risk defined in previous works and matching the definition in the classical theory fails to satisfy the uniform convergence property enjoyed in the classical setting for some learnable classes. Moreover, we show that VC dimension generalization upper bounds in previous work are frequently infinite, even for finite-dimensional POVM classes. To surmount the failure of the standard ERM to satisfy uniform convergence, we define a new learning rule -- denoised ERM. We show this to be a universal learning rule for POVM and probabilistically observed concept classes, and the condition for it to satisfy uniform convergence is finite fat shattering dimension of the class. We give quantitative sample complexity upper and lower bounds for learnability in terms of finite fat-shattering dimension and a notion of approximate finite partitionability into approximately jointly measurable subsets, which allow for sample reuse. We then show that finite fat shattering dimension implies finite coverability by approximately jointly measurable subsets, leading to our matching conditions. We also show that every measurement class defined on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space is PAC learnable. We illustrate our results on several example POVM classes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2023.

Builds on

12 of 55 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 216
  2. 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
  3. 2018Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 37
  4. 2020Sample-efficient learning of quantum many-body systemscited by 37
  5. 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 33
  6. 2020Quantum statistical query learningcited by 21
  7. 2017A Survey of Quantum Learning Theorycited by 12
  8. 2015The Learnability of Unknown Quantum Measurementscited by 9
  9. 2021A Theoretical Framework for Learning from Quantum Datacited by 8
  10. 2022Toward Physically Realizable Quantum Neural Networkscited by 8
  11. 2021Quantum Perceptron Revisited: Computational-Statistical Tradeoffscited by 5
  12. 2022A learning theory for quantum photonic processors and beyondcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.