Quantum statistical query learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a learning model called the quantum statistical learning QSQ model, which extends the SQ learning model introduced by Kearns to the quantum setting. Our model can be also seen as a restriction of the quantum PAC learning model: here, the learner does not have direct access to quantum examples, but can only obtain estimates of measurement statistics on them. Theoretically, this model provides a simple yet expressive setting to explore the power of quantum examples in machine learning. From a practical perspective, since simpler operations are required, learning algorithms in the QSQ model are more feasible for implementation on near-term quantum devices. We prove a number of results about the QSQ learning model. We first show that parity functions, (log n)-juntas and polynomial-sized DNF formulas are efficiently learnable in the QSQ model, in contrast to the classical setting where these problems are provably hard. This implies that many of the advantages of quantum PAC learning can be realized even in the more restricted quantum SQ learning model. It is well-known that weak statistical query dimension, denoted by WSQDIM(C), characterizes the complexity of learning a concept class C in the classical SQ model. We show that log(WSQDIM(C)) is a lower bound on the complexity of QSQ learning, and furthermore it is tight for certain concept classes C. Additionally, we show that this quantity provides strong lower bounds for the small-bias quantum communication model under product distributions. Finally, we introduce the notion of private quantum PAC learning, in which a quantum PAC learner is required to be differentially private. We show that learnability in the QSQ model implies learnability in the quantum private PAC model. Additionally, we show that in the private PAC learning setting, the classical and quantum sample complexities are equal, up to constant factors.
Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 8; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
21 papers.
Sort:
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 133
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2023Beyond Classical Attention: Quantum Attention for Scalable Computationcited by 18
- 2022Enhancing Quantum Adversarial Robustness by Randomized Encodingscited by 17
- 2022Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networkscited by 16
- 2021Sample Complexity of Learning Parametric Quantum Circuitscited by 15
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
- 2025Generative quantum advantage for classical and quantum problemscited by 11
- 2021Private learning implies quantum stabilitycited by 10
- 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noisecited by 8
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithmscited by 7
- 2022Differential Privacy Amplification in Quantum and Quantum-inspired Algorithmscited by 6
9 more
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learningcited by 6
- 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learningcited by 5
- 2023Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queriescited by 5
- 2023Learning Quantum Processes with Quantum Statistical Queriescited by 4
- 2025Quantum advantage for learning shallow neural networks with natural data distributionscited by 3
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNPcited by 1
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classescited by 0
- 2026When AI meets quantum information: A comprehensive reviewcited by 0
- 2026Advantage of Entangled Learning Rules in Quantum Measurement Class Learningcited by 0
- 2026Advantage of Entangled Learning Rules in Quantum Measurement Class Learning5 Oct 2026
- 2026When AI meets quantum information: A comprehensive review1 Jul 2026
- 2025Generative quantum advantage for classical and quantum problems10 Sep 2025
- 2025Quantum advantage for learning shallow neural networks with natural data distributions26 Mar 2025
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing1 May 2024
- 2023Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queries3 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning Quantum Processes with Quantum Statistical Queries3 Oct 2023
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes21 Aug 2023
- 2023Beyond Classical Attention: Quantum Attention for Scalable Computation16 Jul 2023
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithms10 Jul 2023
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning8 Jun 2023
- 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learning5 Jun 2023
9 more
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2022Enhancing Quantum Adversarial Robustness by Randomized Encodings5 Dec 2022
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNP13 Apr 2022
- 2022Differential Privacy Amplification in Quantum and Quantum-inspired Algorithms7 Mar 2022
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Model7 Mar 2022
- 2022Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks14 Feb 2022
- 2021Sample Complexity of Learning Parametric Quantum Circuits19 Jul 2021
- 2021Private learning implies quantum stability14 Feb 2021
- 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noise9 Feb 2021
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 133
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2023Beyond Classical Attention: Quantum Attention for Scalable Computationcited by 18
- 2022Enhancing Quantum Adversarial Robustness by Randomized Encodingscited by 17
- 2022Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networkscited by 16
- 2021Sample Complexity of Learning Parametric Quantum Circuitscited by 15
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
- 2025Generative quantum advantage for classical and quantum problemscited by 11
- 2021Private learning implies quantum stabilitycited by 10
- 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noisecited by 8
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithmscited by 7
- 2022Differential Privacy Amplification in Quantum and Quantum-inspired Algorithmscited by 6
12 most cited of 21 All 21 (JSON)
- 2026Advantage of Entangled Learning Rules in Quantum Measurement Class Learning5 Oct 2026
- 2026When AI meets quantum information: A comprehensive review1 Jul 2026
- 2025Generative quantum advantage for classical and quantum problems10 Sep 2025
- 2025Quantum advantage for learning shallow neural networks with natural data distributions26 Mar 2025
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing1 May 2024
- 2023Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queries3 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning Quantum Processes with Quantum Statistical Queries3 Oct 2023
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes21 Aug 2023
- 2023Beyond Classical Attention: Quantum Attention for Scalable Computation16 Jul 2023
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithms10 Jul 2023
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning8 Jun 2023
- 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learning5 Jun 2023
12 newest of 21 All 21 (JSON)