Sample-efficient learning of quantum many-body systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of learning the Hamiltonian of a quantum many-body system given samples from its Gibbs (thermal) state. The classical analog of this problem, known as learning graphical models or Boltzmann machines, is a well-studied question in machine learning and statistics. In this work, we give the first sample-efficient algorithm for the quantum Hamiltonian learning problem. In particular, we prove that polynomially many samples in the number of particles (qudits) are necessary and sufficient for learning the parameters of a spatially local Hamiltonian in l_2-norm. Our main contribution is in establishing the strong convexity of the log-partition function of quantum many-body systems, which along with the maximum entropy estimation yields our sample-efficient algorithm. Classically, the strong convexity for partition functions follows from the Markov property of Gibbs distributions. This is, however, known to be violated in its exact form in the quantum case. We introduce several new ideas to obtain an unconditional result that avoids relying on the Markov property of quantum systems, at the cost of a slightly weaker bound. In particular, we prove a lower bound on the variance of quasi-local operators with respect to the Gibbs state, which might be of independent interest. Our work paves the way toward a more rigorous application of machine learning techniques to quantum many-body problems.
Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 7; 2023: 7; 2024: 11; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
36 papers.
Sort:
- 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problemscited by 91
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 31
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 22
- 2024Learning shallow quantum circuitscited by 20
- 2023On the Sample Complexity of Quantum Boltzmann Machine Learningcited by 18
- 2022Practical Black Box Hamiltonian Learningcited by 15
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
- 2023The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherentlycited by 12
- 2022Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experimentscited by 11
- 2024Quantum Boltzmann machine learning of ground-state energiescited by 11
- 2024Natural gradient and parameter estimation for quantum Boltzmann machinescited by 9
- 2021Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs statescited by 8
24 more
- 2024Structure learning of Hamiltonians from real-time evolutioncited by 8
- 2022Scalably learning quantum many-body Hamiltonians from dynamical datacited by 7
- 2022Quantum-probabilistic Hamiltonian learning for generative modelling & anomaly detectioncited by 7
- 2024Solving The Quantum Many-Body Hamiltonian Learning Problem with Neural Differential Equationscited by 7
- 2024Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimationcited by 5
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testingcited by 4
- 2024Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensingcited by 4
- 2024Learning the structure of any Hamiltonian from minimal assumptionscited by 4
- 2021Quantum Model Learning Agent: characterisation of quantum systems through machine learningcited by 3
- 2021Active Learning of Quantum System Hamiltonians yields Query Advantagecited by 3
- 2022Provably efficient variational generative modeling of quantum many-body systems via quantum-probabilistic information geometrycited by 3
- 2023Provable learning of quantum states with graphical modelscited by 3
- 2023Learning finitely correlated states: stability of the spectral reconstructioncited by 3
- 2025Ansatz-free Hamiltonian learning with Heisenberg-limited scalingcited by 3
- 2025Quantum thermodynamics and semi-definite optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Sample-efficient Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Quantum Controlcited by 2
- 2024Simple algorithms to test and learn local Hamiltonianscited by 2
- 2025Constrained free energy minimization for the design of thermal states and stabilizer thermodynamic systemscited by 2
- 2021A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Hamiltonian Learning Algorithmcited by 1
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classescited by 0
- 2024Quantum Maximum Entropy Inference and Hamiltonian Learningcited by 0
- 2025Optimal certification of constant-local Hamiltonianscited by 0
- 2026Lindbladian Learning with Neural Differential Equationscited by 0
- 2026Characterizing Arbitrary Lindbladian Dynamics with a Few Pauli Measurementscited by 0
- 2026Characterizing Arbitrary Lindbladian Dynamics with a Few Pauli Measurements25 Jul 2026
- 2026Lindbladian Learning with Neural Differential Equations8 Mar 2026
- 2025Optimal certification of constant-local Hamiltonians10 Dec 2025
- 2025Constrained free energy minimization for the design of thermal states and stabilizer thermodynamic systems12 Aug 2025
- 2025Quantum thermodynamics and semi-definite optimization7 May 2025
- 2025Ansatz-free Hamiltonian learning with Heisenberg-limited scaling17 Feb 2025
- 2024Natural gradient and parameter estimation for quantum Boltzmann machines31 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning the structure of any Hamiltonian from minimal assumptions29 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensing24 Oct 2024
- 2024Quantum Boltzmann machine learning of ground-state energies16 Oct 2024
- 2024Solving The Quantum Many-Body Hamiltonian Learning Problem with Neural Differential Equations16 Aug 2024
- 2024Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimation13 Aug 2024
24 more
- 2024Quantum Maximum Entropy Inference and Hamiltonian Learning16 Jul 2024
- 2024Structure learning of Hamiltonians from real-time evolution30 Apr 2024
- 2024Simple algorithms to test and learn local Hamiltonians9 Apr 2024
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testing5 Mar 2024
- 2024Learning shallow quantum circuits18 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning finitely correlated states: stability of the spectral reconstruction12 Dec 2023
- 2023Provable learning of quantum states with graphical models17 Sep 2023
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes21 Aug 2023
- 2023On the Sample Complexity of Quantum Boltzmann Machine Learning26 Jun 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2023Sample-efficient Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Quantum Control19 Apr 2023
- 2023The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherently22 Mar 2023
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrix8 Dec 2022
- 2022Quantum-probabilistic Hamiltonian learning for generative modelling & anomaly detection7 Nov 2022
- 2022Scalably learning quantum many-body Hamiltonians from dynamical data28 Sep 2022
- 2022Practical Black Box Hamiltonian Learning30 Jun 2022
- 2022Provably efficient variational generative modeling of quantum many-body systems via quantum-probabilistic information geometry9 Jun 2022
- 2022Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experiments28 Apr 2022
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Model7 Mar 2022
- 2021Active Learning of Quantum System Hamiltonians yields Query Advantage29 Dec 2021
- 2021Quantum Model Learning Agent: characterisation of quantum systems through machine learning15 Dec 2021
- 2021Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs states10 Aug 2021
- 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems23 Jun 2021
- 2021A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Hamiltonian Learning Algorithm1 Mar 2021
- 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problemscited by 91
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 31
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 22
- 2024Learning shallow quantum circuitscited by 20
- 2023On the Sample Complexity of Quantum Boltzmann Machine Learningcited by 18
- 2022Practical Black Box Hamiltonian Learningcited by 15
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
- 2023The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherentlycited by 12
- 2022Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experimentscited by 11
- 2024Quantum Boltzmann machine learning of ground-state energiescited by 11
- 2024Natural gradient and parameter estimation for quantum Boltzmann machinescited by 9
- 2021Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs statescited by 8
12 most cited of 36 All 36 (JSON)
- 2026Characterizing Arbitrary Lindbladian Dynamics with a Few Pauli Measurements25 Jul 2026
- 2026Lindbladian Learning with Neural Differential Equations8 Mar 2026
- 2025Optimal certification of constant-local Hamiltonians10 Dec 2025
- 2025Constrained free energy minimization for the design of thermal states and stabilizer thermodynamic systems12 Aug 2025
- 2025Quantum thermodynamics and semi-definite optimization7 May 2025
- 2025Ansatz-free Hamiltonian learning with Heisenberg-limited scaling17 Feb 2025
- 2024Natural gradient and parameter estimation for quantum Boltzmann machines31 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning the structure of any Hamiltonian from minimal assumptions29 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensing24 Oct 2024
- 2024Quantum Boltzmann machine learning of ground-state energies16 Oct 2024
- 2024Solving The Quantum Many-Body Hamiltonian Learning Problem with Neural Differential Equations16 Aug 2024
- 2024Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimation13 Aug 2024
12 newest of 36 All 36 (JSON)