mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

3DHacker: Spectrum-based Decision Boundary Generation for Hard-label 3D Point Cloud Attack

arXiv 2308.07546 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the maturity of depth sensors, the vulnerability of 3D point cloud models has received increasing attention in various applications such as autonomous driving and robot navigation. Previous 3D adversarial attackers either follow the white-box setting to iteratively update the coordinate perturbations based on gradients, or utilize the output model logits to estimate noisy gradients in the black-box setting. However, these attack methods are hard to be deployed in real-world scenarios since realistic 3D applications will not share any model details to users. Therefore, we explore a more challenging yet practical 3D attack setting, textiti.e., attacking point clouds with black-box hard labels, in which the attacker can only have access to the prediction label of the input. To tackle this setting, we propose a novel 3D attack method, termed 3D Hard-label attacker (3DHacker), based on the developed decision boundary algorithm to generate adversarial samples solely with the knowledge of class labels. Specifically, to construct the class-aware model decision boundary, 3DHacker first randomly fuses two point clouds of different classes in the spectral domain to craft their intermediate sample with high imperceptibility, then projects it onto the decision boundary via binary search. To restrict the final perturbation size, 3DHacker further introduces an iterative optimization strategy to move the intermediate sample along the decision boundary for generating adversarial point clouds with smallest trivial perturbations. Extensive evaluations show that, even in the challenging hard-label setting, 3DHacker still competitively outperforms existing 3D attacks regarding the attack performance as well as adversary quality.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.

Builds on

47 of 58 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  6. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  7. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  8. 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
  9. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  10. 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 732
  11. 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
  12. 2021Point-BERT: Pre-training 3D Point Cloud Transformers with Masked Point Modelingcited by 653
35 more
  1. 2019Revisiting Point Cloud Classification: A New Benchmark Dataset and Classification Model on Real-World Datacited by 532
  2. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
  3. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  4. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
  5. 2021PAConv: Position Adaptive Convolution with Dynamic Kernel Assembling on Point Cloudscited by 211
  6. 2021Walk in the Cloud: Learning Curves for Point Clouds Shape Analysiscited by 172
  7. 2021Revisiting Point Cloud Shape Classification with a Simple and Effective Baselinecited by 145
  8. 2018Generating 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 144
  9. 2018AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networkscited by 137
  10. 2018PointCloud Saliency Mapscited by 112
  11. 2020QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attackcited by 104
  12. 2019Extending Adversarial Attacks and Defenses to Deep 3D Point Cloud Classifierscited by 92
  13. 2019AdvPC: Transferable Adversarial Perturbations on 3D Point Cloudscited by 84
  14. 2016Shape Completion Enabled Robotic Graspingcited by 79
  15. 2019Adversarial Attack and Defense on Point Setscited by 63
  16. 2019Robustness of 3D Deep Learning in an Adversarial Settingcited by 55
  17. 2020LG-GAN: Label Guided Adversarial Network for Flexible Targeted Attack of Point Cloud-based Deep Networkscited by 55
  18. 2018A LiDAR Point Cloud Generator: from a Virtual World to Autonomous Drivingcited by 54
  19. 2022Shape-invariant 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 50
  20. 2018Guessing Smart: Biased Sampling for Efficient Black-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 46
  21. 2020On Isometry Robustness of Deep 3D Point Cloud Models under Adversarial Attackscited by 46
  22. 2021PVT: Point-Voxel Transformer for Point Cloud Learningcited by 43
  23. 2020Minimal Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning on 3D Point Cloudscited by 41
  24. 2021Imperceptible Transfer Attack and Defense on 3D Point Cloud Classificationcited by 36
  25. 2023Density-Insensitive Unsupervised Domain Adaption on 3D Object Detectioncited by 31
  26. 2022Isometric 3D Adversarial Examples in the Physical Worldcited by 25
  27. 2020Graph Signal Processing for Geometric Data and Beyond: Theory and Applicationscited by 23
  28. 2020ShapeAdv: Generating Shape-Aware Adversarial 3D Point Cloudscited by 20
  29. 2022Exploring the Devil in Graph Spectral Domain for 3D Point Cloud Attackscited by 19
  30. 2022Robust Structured Declarative Classifiers for 3D Point Clouds: Defending Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Gradientscited by 17
  31. 2022Point Cloud Attacks in Graph Spectral Domain: When 3D Geometry Meets Graph Signal Processingcited by 16
  32. 2020Defense-PointNet: Protecting PointNet Against Adversarial Attackscited by 13
  33. 20223DeformRS: Certifying Spatial Deformations on Point Cloudscited by 10
  34. 2021Nonlinear Projection Based Gradient Estimation for Query Efficient Blackbox Attackscited by 9
  35. 2019Black-Box Decision based Adversarial Attack with Symmetric α-stable Distributioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 5.

9 papers.