3DHacker: Spectrum-based Decision Boundary Generation for Hard-label 3D Point Cloud Attack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the maturity of depth sensors, the vulnerability of 3D point cloud models has received increasing attention in various applications such as autonomous driving and robot navigation. Previous 3D adversarial attackers either follow the white-box setting to iteratively update the coordinate perturbations based on gradients, or utilize the output model logits to estimate noisy gradients in the black-box setting. However, these attack methods are hard to be deployed in real-world scenarios since realistic 3D applications will not share any model details to users. Therefore, we explore a more challenging yet practical 3D attack setting, textiti.e., attacking point clouds with black-box hard labels, in which the attacker can only have access to the prediction label of the input. To tackle this setting, we propose a novel 3D attack method, termed 3D Hard-label attacker (3DHacker), based on the developed decision boundary algorithm to generate adversarial samples solely with the knowledge of class labels. Specifically, to construct the class-aware model decision boundary, 3DHacker first randomly fuses two point clouds of different classes in the spectral domain to craft their intermediate sample with high imperceptibility, then projects it onto the decision boundary via binary search. To restrict the final perturbation size, 3DHacker further introduces an iterative optimization strategy to move the intermediate sample along the decision boundary for generating adversarial point clouds with smallest trivial perturbations. Extensive evaluations show that, even in the challenging hard-label setting, 3DHacker still competitively outperforms existing 3D attacks regarding the attack performance as well as adversary quality.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.
Builds on
47 of 58 references.
References · 47
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
- 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 732
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
- 2021Point-BERT: Pre-training 3D Point Cloud Transformers with Masked Point Modelingcited by 653
35 more
- 2019Revisiting Point Cloud Classification: A New Benchmark Dataset and Classification Model on Real-World Datacited by 532
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
- 2021PAConv: Position Adaptive Convolution with Dynamic Kernel Assembling on Point Cloudscited by 211
- 2021Walk in the Cloud: Learning Curves for Point Clouds Shape Analysiscited by 172
- 2021Revisiting Point Cloud Shape Classification with a Simple and Effective Baselinecited by 145
- 2018Generating 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 144
- 2018AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2018PointCloud Saliency Mapscited by 112
- 2020QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attackcited by 104
- 2019Extending Adversarial Attacks and Defenses to Deep 3D Point Cloud Classifierscited by 92
- 2019AdvPC: Transferable Adversarial Perturbations on 3D Point Cloudscited by 84
- 2016Shape Completion Enabled Robotic Graspingcited by 79
- 2019Adversarial Attack and Defense on Point Setscited by 63
- 2019Robustness of 3D Deep Learning in an Adversarial Settingcited by 55
- 2020LG-GAN: Label Guided Adversarial Network for Flexible Targeted Attack of Point Cloud-based Deep Networkscited by 55
- 2018A LiDAR Point Cloud Generator: from a Virtual World to Autonomous Drivingcited by 54
- 2022Shape-invariant 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 50
- 2018Guessing Smart: Biased Sampling for Efficient Black-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 46
- 2020On Isometry Robustness of Deep 3D Point Cloud Models under Adversarial Attackscited by 46
- 2021PVT: Point-Voxel Transformer for Point Cloud Learningcited by 43
- 2020Minimal Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning on 3D Point Cloudscited by 41
- 2021Imperceptible Transfer Attack and Defense on 3D Point Cloud Classificationcited by 36
- 2023Density-Insensitive Unsupervised Domain Adaption on 3D Object Detectioncited by 31
- 2022Isometric 3D Adversarial Examples in the Physical Worldcited by 25
- 2020Graph Signal Processing for Geometric Data and Beyond: Theory and Applicationscited by 23
- 2020ShapeAdv: Generating Shape-Aware Adversarial 3D Point Cloudscited by 20
- 2022Exploring the Devil in Graph Spectral Domain for 3D Point Cloud Attackscited by 19
- 2022Robust Structured Declarative Classifiers for 3D Point Clouds: Defending Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Gradientscited by 17
- 2022Point Cloud Attacks in Graph Spectral Domain: When 3D Geometry Meets Graph Signal Processingcited by 16
- 2020Defense-PointNet: Protecting PointNet Against Adversarial Attackscited by 13
- 20223DeformRS: Certifying Spatial Deformations on Point Cloudscited by 10
- 2021Nonlinear Projection Based Gradient Estimation for Query Efficient Blackbox Attackscited by 9
- 2019Black-Box Decision based Adversarial Attack with Symmetric α-stable Distributioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 5.
9 papers.
- 2023A Survey of Robustness and Safety of 2D and 3D Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attackscited by 19
- 2024Joint Top-Down and Bottom-Up Frameworks for 3D Visual Groundingcited by 3
- 2025NoPain: No-box Point Cloud Attack via Optimal Transport Singular Boundarycited by 2
- 2025Towards a 3D Transfer-based Black-box Attack via Critical Feature Guidancecited by 2
- 2024Hard-Label Black-Box Attacks on 3D Point Cloudscited by 0
- 2024Sustainable Self-evolution Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2025Data-Free Universal Attack by Exploiting the Intrinsic Vulnerability of Deep Modelscited by 0
- 2025Rethinking Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks on Point Cloud Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Learning from Few Samples: A Novel Approach for High-Quality Malcode Generationcited by 0
- 2025Learning from Few Samples: A Novel Approach for High-Quality Malcode Generation25 Aug 2025
- 2025Towards a 3D Transfer-based Black-box Attack via Critical Feature Guidance21 Aug 2025
- 2025Rethinking Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks on Point Cloud Classification28 May 2025
- 2025Data-Free Universal Attack by Exploiting the Intrinsic Vulnerability of Deep Models28 Mar 2025
- 2025NoPain: No-box Point Cloud Attack via Optimal Transport Singular Boundary27 Feb 2025
- 2024Sustainable Self-evolution Adversarial Training3 Dec 2024
- 2024Hard-Label Black-Box Attacks on 3D Point Clouds30 Nov 2024
- 2024Joint Top-Down and Bottom-Up Frameworks for 3D Visual Grounding21 Oct 2024
- 2023A Survey of Robustness and Safety of 2D and 3D Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attacks1 Oct 2023