Data-Free Universal Attack by Exploiting the Intrinsic Vulnerability of Deep Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are susceptible to Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs), which are instance agnostic perturbations that can deceive a target model across a wide range of samples. Unlike instance-specific adversarial examples, UAPs present a greater challenge as they must generalize across different samples and models. Generating UAPs typically requires access to numerous examples, which is a strong assumption in real-world tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel data-free method called Intrinsic UAP (IntriUAP), by exploiting the intrinsic vulnerabilities of deep models. We analyze a series of popular deep models composed of linear and nonlinear layers with a Lipschitz constant of 1, revealing that the vulnerability of these models is predominantly influenced by their linear components. Based on this observation, we leverage the ill-conditioned nature of the linear components by aligning the UAP with the right singular vectors corresponding to the maximum singular value of each linear layer. Remarkably, our method achieves highly competitive performance in attacking popular image classification deep models without using any image samples. We also evaluate the black-box attack performance of our method, showing that it matches the state-of-the-art baseline for data-free methods on models that conform to our theoretical framework. Beyond the data-free assumption, IntriUAP also operates under a weaker assumption, where the adversary only can access a few of the victim model's layers. Experiments demonstrate that the attack success rate decreases by only 4% when the adversary has access to just 50% of the linear layers in the victim model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
13 more
- 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
- 2018The Singular Values of Convolutional Layerscited by 95
- 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 88
- 2018Generalizable Data-free Objective for Crafting Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 88
- 2017Fast Feature Fool: A data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbationscited by 66
- 2020Understanding Adversarial Examples from the Mutual Influence of Images and Perturbationscited by 59
- 2017NAG: Network for Adversary Generationcited by 51
- 2017Art of singular vectors and universal adversarial perturbationscited by 49
- 2018Ask, Acquire, and Attack: Data-free UAP Generation using Class Impressionscited by 31
- 2020CD-UAP: Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 27
- 2023Enhancing Generalization of Universal Adversarial Perturbation through Gradient Aggregationcited by 22
- 20233DHacker: Spectrum-based Decision Boundary Generation for Hard-label 3D Point Cloud Attackcited by 9
- 2024Detecting Adversarial Spectrum Attacks via Distance to Decision Boundary Statisticscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.