Generating Faithful Text From a Knowledge Graph with Noisy Reference Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge Graph (KG)-to-Text generation aims at generating fluent natural-language text that accurately represents the information of a given knowledge graph. While significant progress has been made in this task by exploiting the power of pre-trained language models (PLMs) with appropriate graph structure-aware modules, existing models still fall short of generating faithful text, especially when the ground-truth natural-language text contains additional information that is not present in the graph. In this paper, we develop a KG-to-text generation model that can generate faithful natural-language text from a given graph, in the presence of noisy reference text. Our framework incorporates two core ideas: Firstly, we utilize contrastive learning to enhance the model's ability to differentiate between faithful and hallucinated information in the text, thereby encouraging the decoder to generate text that aligns with the input graph. Secondly, we empower the decoder to control the level of hallucination in the generated text by employing a controllable text generation technique. We evaluate our model's performance through the standard quantitative metrics as well as a ChatGPT-based quantitative and qualitative analysis. Our evaluation demonstrates the superior performance of our model over state-of-the-art KG-to-text models on faithfulness.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2023.
Builds on
47 of 64 references.
References · 47
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
35 more
- 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
- 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 167
- 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 152
- 2021SimCLS: A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 132
- 2019Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Graph Transformerscited by 122
- 2021CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 120
- 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
- 2022FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialoguecited by 109
- 2020Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 107
- 2021Neural Path Hunter: Reducing Hallucination in Dialogue Systems via Path Groundingcited by 106
- 2020Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Taskscited by 104
- 2021Supporting Clustering with Contrastive Learningcited by 90
- 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 84
- 2021Increasing Faithfulness in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue with Controllable Featurescited by 74
- 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 68
- 2019Sticking to the Facts: Confident Decoding for Faithful Data-to-Text Generationcited by 62
- 2018Story Ending Generation with Incremental Encoding and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 60
- 2021JointGT: Graph-Text Joint Representation Learning for Text Generation from Knowledge Graphscited by 58
- 2020Language Generation with Multi-Hop Reasoning on Commonsense Knowledge Graphcited by 57
- 2021Plan-then-Generate: Controlled Data-to-Text Generation via Planningcited by 52
- 2022FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 49
- 2020Towards Faithful Neural Table-to-Text Generation with Content-Matching Constraintscited by 48
- 2021CONFIT: Toward Faithful Dialogue Summarization with Linguistically-Informed Contrastive Fine-tuningcited by 44
- 2021Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 41
- 2020CycleGT: Unsupervised Graph-to-Text and Text-to-Graph Generation via Cycle Trainingcited by 38
- 2020Modeling Global and Local Node Contexts for Text Generation from Knowledge Graphscited by 30
- 2020Toward Subgraph-Guided Knowledge Graph Question Generation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2021Sketch and Refine: Towards Faithful and Informative Table-to-Text Generationcited by 21
- 2022Improving the Faithfulness of Abstractive Summarization via Entity Coverage Controlcited by 21
- 2022GAP: A Graph-aware Language Model Framework for Knowledge Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 16
- 2021EventNarrative: A large-scale Event-centric Dataset for Knowledge Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 14
- 2022Self-supervised Graph Masking Pre-training for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 8
- 2020Boosting House Price Predictions using Geo-Spatial Network Embeddingcited by 7
- 2021AGGGEN: Ordering and Aggregating while Generatingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 49
- 2023Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Taskscited by 9
- 2023Think While You Write: Hypothesis Verification Promotes Faithful Knowledge-to-Text Generationcited by 5
- 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Survey5 Oct 2025
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs6 Feb 2024
- 2023Think While You Write: Hypothesis Verification Promotes Faithful Knowledge-to-Text Generation16 Nov 2023
- 2023Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Tasks9 Nov 2023