mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NSA: Naturalistic Support Artifact to Boost Network Confidence

arXiv 2307.14917 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual AI systems are vulnerable to natural and synthetic physical corruption in the real-world. Such corruption often arises unexpectedly and alters the model's performance. In recent years, the primary focus has been on adversarial attacks. However, natural corruptions (e.g., snow, fog, dust) are an omnipresent threat to visual AI systems and should be considered equally important. Many existing works propose interesting solutions to train robust models against natural corruption. These works either leverage image augmentations, which come with the additional cost of model training, or place suspicious patches in the scene to design unadversarial examples. In this work, we propose the idea of naturalistic support artifacts (NSA) for robust prediction. The NSAs are shown to be beneficial in scenarios where model parameters are inaccessible and adding artifacts in the scene is feasible. The NSAs are natural looking objects generated through artifact training using DC-GAN to have high visual fidelity in the scene. We test against natural corruptions on the Imagenette dataset and observe the improvement in prediction confidence score by four times. We also demonstrate NSA's capability to increase adversarial accuracy by 8% on average. Lastly, we qualitatively analyze NSAs using saliency maps to understand how they help improve prediction confidence.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  9. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  10. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  12. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
14 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  2. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  3. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  4. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  5. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  6. 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 148
  7. 2020Rethinking Importance Weighting for Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 92
  8. 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
  9. 2020Unadversarial Examples: Designing Objects for Robust Visioncited by 45
  10. 2021TnT Attacks! Universal Naturalistic Adversarial Patches Against Deep Neural Network Systemscited by 36
  11. 2022Defensive Patches for Robust Recognition in the Physical Worldcited by 20
  12. 2022Adversarial Patch Attacks and Defences in Vision-Based Tasks: A Surveycited by 17
  13. 2019TorchGAN: A Flexible Framework for GAN Training and Evaluationcited by 6
  14. 2022Soft Adversarial Training Can Retain Natural Accuracycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.