Domain Adaptive Diabetic Retinopathy Grading with Model Absence and Flowing Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Domain shift (the difference between source and target domains) poses a significant challenge in clinical applications, e.g., Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) grading. Despite considering certain clinical requirements, like source data privacy, conventional transfer methods are predominantly model-centered and often struggle to prevent model-targeted attacks. In this paper, we address a challenging Online Model-aGnostic Domain Adaptation (OMG-DA) setting, driven by the demands of clinical environments. This setting is characterized by the absence of the model and the flow of target data. To tackle the new challenge, we propose a novel approach, Generative Unadversarial ExampleS (GUES), which enables adaptation from a data-centric perspective. Specifically, we first theoretically reformulate conventional perturbation optimization in a generative way--learning a perturbation generation function with a latent input variable. During model instantiation, we leverage a Variational AutoEncoder to express this function. The encoder with the reparameterization trick predicts the latent input, whilst the decoder is responsible for the generation. Furthermore, the saliency map is selected as pseudo-perturbation labels. Because it not only captures potential lesions but also theoretically provides an upper bound on the function input, enabling the identification of the latent variable. Extensive comparative experiments on DR benchmarks with both frozen pre-trained models and trainable models demonstrate the superiority of GUES, showing robustness even with small batch size.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2024.
Builds on
21 of 41 references.
References · 21
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2021Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 177
- 2021CDTrans: Cross-domain Transformer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 129
- 2018An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learningcited by 112
- 2021Applications of Deep Learning in Fundus Images: A Reviewcited by 59
- 2022Confidence Score for Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 59
9 more
- 2020Unadversarial Examples: Designing Objects for Robust Visioncited by 45
- 2022On-the-Fly Test-time Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 34
- 2023Towards Generalizable Diabetic Retinopathy Grading in Unseen Domainscited by 21
- 2022SSiT: Saliency-guided Self-supervised Image Transformer for Diabetic Retinopathy Gradingcited by 9
- 2021Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading using Vessel Image Reconstructioncited by 5
- 2024Unified Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 5
- 2023CAT:Collaborative Adversarial Trainingcited by 2
- 2023NSA: Naturalistic Support Artifact to Boost Network Confidencecited by 1
- 2024Saliency-guided and Patch-based Mixup for Long-tailed Skin Cancer Image Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.