Sparse Double Descent in Vision Transformers: real or phantom threat?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision transformers (ViT) have been of broad interest in recent theoretical and empirical works. They are state-of-the-art thanks to their attention-based approach, which boosts the identification of key features and patterns within images thanks to the capability of avoiding inductive bias, resulting in highly accurate image analysis. Meanwhile, neoteric studies have reported a ``sparse double descent'' phenomenon that can occur in modern deep-learning models, where extremely over-parametrized models can generalize well. This raises practical questions about the optimal size of the model and the quest over finding the best trade-off between sparsity and performance is launched: are Vision Transformers also prone to sparse double descent? Can we find a way to avoid such a phenomenon? Our work tackles the occurrence of sparse double descent on ViTs. Despite some works that have shown that traditional architectures, like Resnet, are condemned to the sparse double descent phenomenon, for ViTs we observe that an optimally-tuned ℓ2 regularization relieves such a phenomenon. However, everything comes at a cost: optimal lambda will sacrifice the potential compression of the ViT.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.
Builds on
21 of 26 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2020Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 3,229
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 566
9 more
- 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
- 2022Sparse Double Descent: Where Network Pruning Aggravates Overfittingcited by 26
- 2022Regularization-wise double descent: Why it occurs and how to eliminate itcited by 9
- 2023DSD2: Can We Dodge Sparse Double Descent and Compress the Neural Network Worry-Free?cited by 6
- 2023Can we avoid Double Descent in Deep Neural Networks?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.