mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can we avoid Double Descent in Deep Neural Networks?

arXiv 2302.13259 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finding the optimal size of deep learning models is very actual and of broad impact, especially in energy-saving schemes. Very recently, an unexpected phenomenon, the ``double descent'', has caught the attention of the deep learning community. As the model's size grows, the performance gets first worse, and then goes back to improving. It raises serious questions about the optimal model's size to maintain high generalization: the model needs to be sufficiently over-parametrized, but adding too many parameters wastes training resources. Is it possible to find, in an efficient way, the best trade-off? Our work shows that the double descent phenomenon is potentially avoidable with proper conditioning of the learning problem, but a final answer is yet to be found. We empirically observe that there is hope to dodge the double descent in complex scenarios with proper regularization, as a simple ℓ2 regularization is already positively contributing to such a perspective.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2023.

Builds on

18 of 21 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  3. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  4. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  5. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  6. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  7. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  8. 2020Multi-task self-supervised learning for Robust Speech Recognitioncited by 127
  9. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
  10. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
  11. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  12. 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
6 more
  1. 2020Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From Double Descent to Pruning Neural Networkscited by 40
  2. 2022Sparse Double Descent: Where Network Pruning Aggravates Overfittingcited by 26
  3. 2022To update or not to update? Neurons at equilibrium in deep modelscited by 13
  4. 2022Multiple Descent in the Multiple Random Feature Modelcited by 10
  5. 2022Regularization-wise double descent: Why it occurs and how to eliminate itcited by 9
  6. 2022The rise of the lottery heroes: why zero-shot pruning is hardcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.