DSD2: Can We Dodge Sparse Double Descent and Compress the Neural Network Worry-Free?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neoteric works have shown that modern deep learning models can exhibit a sparse double descent phenomenon. Indeed, as the sparsity of the model increases, the test performance first worsens since the model is overfitting the training data; then, the overfitting reduces, leading to an improvement in performance, and finally, the model begins to forget critical information, resulting in underfitting. Such a behavior prevents using traditional early stop criteria. In this work, we have three key contributions. First, we propose a learning framework that avoids such a phenomenon and improves generalization. Second, we introduce an entropy measure providing more insights into the insurgence of this phenomenon and enabling the use of traditional stop criteria. Third, we provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of contingent factors such as re-initialization methods, model width and depth, and dataset noise. The contributions are supported by empirical evidence in typical setups. Our code is available at https://github.com/VGCQ/DSD2.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.
Builds on
46 of 60 references.
References · 46
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
34 more
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2022On-Device Training Under 256KB Memorycited by 158
- 2021Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillationcited by 131
- 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
- 2021Efficient Lottery Ticket Finding: Less Data is Morecited by 44
- 2020Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From Double Descent to Pruning Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2020A Survey of Methods for Low-Power Deep Learning and Computer Visioncited by 37
- 2016Deep Model Compression: Distilling Knowledge from Noisy Teacherscited by 35
- 2022Sparse Double Descent: Where Network Pruning Aggravates Overfittingcited by 26
- 2020LOss-Based SensiTivity rEgulaRization: towards deep sparse neural networkscited by 19
- 2020Solvable Model for Inheriting the Regularization through Knowledge Distillationcited by 15
- 2021Prune Your Model Before Distill Itcited by 12
- 2022Multiple Descent in the Multiple Random Feature Modelcited by 10
- 2022Regularization-wise double descent: Why it occurs and how to eliminate itcited by 9
- 2022Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimalitycited by 9
- 2022Blind Knowledge Distillation for Robust Image Classificationcited by 9
- 2021Distilling Double Descentcited by 7
- 2020Avoiding The Double Descent Phenomenon of Random Feature Models Using Hybrid Regularizationcited by 3
- 2021Mitigating deep double descent by concatenating inputscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Layer Collapse Can be Induced by Unstructured Pruningcited by 4
- 2024The Simpler The Better: An Entropy-Based Importance Metric To Reduce Neural Networks' Depthcited by 3
- 2023Sparse Double Descent in Vision Transformers: real or phantom threat?cited by 2
- 2024LaCoOT: Layer Collapse through Optimal Transportcited by 1
- 2025Efficient Adaptation of Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation in Space Applicationscited by 1
- 2023The Quest of Finding the Antidote to Sparse Double Descentcited by 0
- 2025Efficient Adaptation of Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation in Space Applications22 Apr 2025
- 2024LaCoOT: Layer Collapse through Optimal Transport13 Jun 2024
- 2024The Simpler The Better: An Entropy-Based Importance Metric To Reduce Neural Networks' Depth27 Apr 2024
- 2024Layer Collapse Can be Induced by Unstructured Pruning24 Apr 2024
- 2023The Quest of Finding the Antidote to Sparse Double Descent31 Aug 2023
- 2023Sparse Double Descent in Vision Transformers: real or phantom threat?26 Jul 2023