mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting the Performance-Explainability Trade-Off in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

arXiv 2307.14239 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023cs.AI cs.SEcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Within the field of Requirements Engineering (RE), the increasing significance of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in aligning AI-supported systems with user needs, societal expectations, and regulatory standards has garnered recognition. In general, explainability has emerged as an important non-functional requirement that impacts system quality. However, the supposed trade-off between explainability and performance challenges the presumed positive influence of explainability. If meeting the requirement of explainability entails a reduction in system performance, then careful consideration must be given to which of these quality aspects takes precedence and how to compromise between them. In this paper, we critically examine the alleged trade-off. We argue that it is best approached in a nuanced way that incorporates resource availability, domain characteristics, and considerations of risk. By providing a foundation for future research and best practices, this work aims to advance the field of RE for AI.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

30 of 84 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  7. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  8. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  11. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  12. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
18 more
  1. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  2. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  4. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  5. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  6. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  7. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  8. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  9. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  10. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
  11. 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
  12. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  13. 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 87
  14. 2019Understanding Neural Networks via Feature Visualization: A surveycited by 65
  15. 2021To trust or not to trust an explanation: using LEAF to evaluate local linear XAI methodscited by 26
  16. 2021Exploring Explainability: A Definition, a Model, and a Knowledge Cataloguecited by 15
  17. 2022What is Proxy Discrimination?cited by 7
  18. 2022How to Evaluate Explainability? -- A Case for Three Criteriacited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

10 papers.