LLM-based Affective Text Generation Quality Based on Different Quantization Values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models exhibit a remarkable capacity in language generation and comprehension. These advances enable AI systems to produce more human-like and emotionally engaging text. However, these models rely on a large number of parameters, requiring significant computational resources for training and inference. In some scenarios, accessing these resources can be challenging (e.g., budget or hardware limitations). Techniques like reducing precision bits can make models more memory-efficient, reducing the computational resources needed, at the cost of reduced accuracy. This paper addresses the trade-off between different quantization values, GPU RAM utilization, and text quality in affective text generation (e.g., "I really enjoy running in the snow-covered forest"). To evaluate, we use an emotion classifier and ten seed prompts to generate affective text. We test three setups of precision bits (8, 16, and 32) across five open-weight language models from two different families. Our findings demonstrate that bit reductions lead to memory savings, achieving a reduction of 76%. However, this optimization comes with a trade-off, leading to a decrease of up to 10 pp in F1 score for larger models and an increase of 10 pp for smaller models, along with roughly double the inference time. In terms of text quality, larger models at lower quantization levels generally outperform smaller, higher-precision models -- while requiring similar memory.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.
Builds on
13 of 24 references.
References · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2015BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagationscited by 592
- 2017Emotional Chatting Machine: Emotional Conversation Generation with Internal and External Memorycited by 167
- 2018Polite Dialogue Generation Without Parallel Datacited by 59
- 2017Affect-LM: A Neural Language Model for Customizable Affective Text Generationcited by 50
- 2019Affect-Driven Dialog Generationcited by 50
- 2022Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Predictioncited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Affective Computing in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey from the NLP Perspective
- 2026Evaluating Prompt Engineering Strategies for Sentiment Control in AI-Generated Texts
- 2025Leveraging Large Language Models for Predictive Analysis of Human Misery
- 2025ELSA: A Style Aligned Dataset for Emotionally Intelligent Language Generation
- 2025Multimodal Large Language Models for End-to-End Affective Computing: Benchmarking and Boosting with Generative Knowledge Prompting
- 2025From Rational Answers to Emotional Resonance: The Role of Controllable Emotion Generation in Language Models
- 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2026More Human, More Efficient: Aligning Annotations with Quantized SLMs