mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hyper Hawkes Processes: Interpretable Models of Marked Temporal Point Processes

arXiv 2511.01096 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundational marked temporal point process (MTPP) models, such as the Hawkes process, often use inexpressive model families in order to offer interpretable parameterizations of event data. On the other hand, neural MTPPs models forego this interpretability in favor of absolute predictive performance. In this work, we present a new family MTPP models: the hyper Hawkes process (HHP), which aims to be as flexible and performant as neural MTPPs, while retaining interpretable aspects. To achieve this, the HHP extends the classical Hawkes process to increase its expressivity by first expanding the dimension of the process into a latent space, and then introducing a hypernetwork to allow time- and data-dependent dynamics. These extensions define a highly performant MTPP family, achieving state-of-the-art performance across a range of benchmark tasks and metrics. Furthermore, by retaining the linearity of the recurrence, albeit now piecewise and conditionally linear, the HHP also retains much of the structure of the original Hawkes process, which we exploit to create direct probes into how the model creates predictions. HHP models therefore offer both state-of-the-art predictions, while also providing an opportunity to ``open the box'' and inspect how predictions were generated.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.

Builds on

29 of 49 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  4. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  5. 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 788
  6. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  7. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  8. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
  9. 2024The Illusion of State in State-Space Modelscited by 187
  10. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
  11. 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
  12. 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
17 more
  1. 2021Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participantscited by 93
  2. 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
  3. 2016Tunable Efficient Unitary Neural Networks (EUNN) and their application to RNNscited by 65
  4. 2022HYPRO: A Hybridly Normalized Probabilistic Model for Long-Horizon Prediction of Event Sequencescited by 57
  5. 2023Parallelizing non-linear sequential models over the sequence lengthcited by 45
  6. 2019Imputing Missing Events in Continuous-Time Event Streamscited by 44
  7. 2024Towards Scalable and Stable Parallelization of Nonlinear RNNscited by 38
  8. 2023Meta Temporal Point Processescited by 17
  9. 2023On the Predictive Accuracy of Neural Temporal Point Process Models for Continuous-time Event Datacited by 14
  10. 2020How recurrent networks implement contextual processing in sentiment analysiscited by 11
  11. 2024Interpretable Transformer Hawkes Processes: Unveiling Complex Interactions in Social Networkscited by 11
  12. 2024Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequencescited by 11
  13. 2023Interacting Diffusion Processes for Event Sequence Forecastingcited by 10
  14. 2024Neuro-Symbolic Temporal Point Processescited by 6
  15. 2024Decoupled Marked Temporal Point Process using Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 6
  16. 2024Mamba Hawkes Processcited by 5
  17. 2021Validation of point process predictions with proper scoring rulescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.