mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analysis of LiDAR Configurations on Off-road Semantic Segmentation Performance

arXiv 2306.16551 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2023cs.CV cs.RO eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the impact of LiDAR configuration shifts on the performance of 3D LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation models, a topic not extensively studied before. We explore the effect of using different LiDAR channels when training and testing a 3D LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation model, utilizing Cylinder3D for the experiments. A Cylinder3D model is trained and tested on simulated 3D LiDAR point cloud datasets created using the Mississippi State University Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS) and 32, 64 channel 3D LiDAR point clouds of the RELLIS-3D dataset collected in a real-world off-road environment. Our experimental results demonstrate that sensor and spatial domain shifts significantly impact the performance of LiDAR-based semantic segmentation models. In the absence of spatial domain changes between training and testing, models trained and tested on the same sensor type generally exhibited better performance. Moreover, higher-resolution sensors showed improved performance compared to those with lower-resolution ones. However, results varied when spatial domain changes were present. In some cases, the advantage of a sensor's higher resolution led to better performance both with and without sensor domain shifts. In other instances, the higher resolution resulted in overfitting within a specific domain, causing a lack of generalization capability and decreased performance when tested on data with different sensor configurations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  4. 2020Cylindrical and Asymmetrical 3D Convolution Networks for LiDAR Segmentationcited by 389
  5. 2020LiDARsim: Realistic LiDAR Simulation by Leveraging the Real Worldcited by 137
  6. 2020SemanticPOSS: A Point Cloud Dataset with Large Quantity of Dynamic Instancescited by 123
  7. 2020RELLIS-3D Dataset: Data, Benchmarks and Analysiscited by 119
  8. 2021KITTI-CARLA: a KITTI-like dataset generated by CARLA Simulatorcited by 34
  9. 2022ORFD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Off-Road Freespace Detectioncited by 33
  10. 2018GONet: A Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Approach For Traversability Estimationcited by 29
  11. 2020LIBRE: The Multiple 3D LiDAR Datasetcited by 26
  12. 2021OFFSEG: A Semantic Segmentation Framework For Off-Road Drivingcited by 20
4 more
  1. 2020Learn to Navigate Maplessly with Varied LiDAR Configurations: A Support Point-Based Approachcited by 5
  2. 2021LRGNet: Learnable Region Growing for Class-Agnostic Point Cloud Segmentationcited by 5
  3. 2019Multi-view Incremental Segmentation of 3D Point Clouds for Mobile Robotscited by 4
  4. 2018An Optimal LiDAR Configuration Approach for Self-Driving Carscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.