About the Cost of Central Privacy in Density Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study non-parametric density estimation for densities in Lipschitz and Sobolev spaces, and under central privacy. In particular, we investigate regimes where the privacy budget is not supposed to be constant. We consider the classical definition of central differential privacy, but also the more recent notion of central concentrated differential privacy. We recover the result of Barber and Duchi (2014) stating that histogram estimators are optimal against Lipschitz distributions for the L2 risk, and under regular differential privacy, and we extend it to other norms and notions of privacy. Then, we investigate higher degrees of smoothness, drawing two conclusions: First, and contrary to what happens with constant privacy budget (Wasserman and Zhou, 2010), there are regimes where imposing privacy degrades the regular minimax risk of estimation on Sobolev densities. Second, so-called projection estimators are near-optimal against the same classes of densities in this new setup with pure differential privacy, but contrary to the constant privacy budget case, it comes at the cost of relaxation. With zero concentrated differential privacy, there is no need for relaxation, and we prove that the estimation is optimal.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2023.
Builds on
28 of 66 references.
References · 28
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 144
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2017Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervalscited by 104
- 2018Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 104
- 2020CoinPress: Practical Private Mean and Covariance Estimationcited by 74
- 2020Differentially Private Assouad, Fano, and Le Camcited by 55
- 2021Improved Rates for Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Datacited by 47
16 more
- 2023From Robustness to Privacy and Backcited by 27
- 2013Local Privacy, Data Processing Inequalities, and Statistical Minimax Ratescited by 26
- 2017Differentially Private Testing of Identity and Closeness of Discrete Distributionscited by 25
- 2020Near Instance-Optimality in Differential Privacycited by 23
- 2020Unified lower bounds for interactive high-dimensional estimation under information constraintscited by 22
- 2019Local differential privacy: Elbow effect in optimal density estimation and adaptation over Besov ellipsoidscited by 13
- 2021Inference under Information Constraints III: Local Privacy Constraintscited by 13
- 2021Optimal Rates for Nonparametric Density Estimation under Communication Constraintscited by 9
- 2020Strongly universally consistent nonparametric regression and classification with privatised datacited by 8
- 2021Information-constrained optimization: can adaptive processing of gradients help?cited by 8
- 2022On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraintscited by 6
- 2022Private Quantiles Estimation in the Presence of Atomscited by 5
- 2023A Polynomial Time, Pure Differentially Private Estimator for Binary Product Distributionscited by 5
- 2021Multivariate density estimation from privatised data: universal consistency and minimax ratescited by 3
- 2023Private Statistical Estimation of Many Quantilescited by 3
- 2023Sparsity in neural networks can improve their privacycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.