Private Quantiles Estimation in the Presence of Atoms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the differentially private estimation of multiple quantiles (MQ) of a distribution from a dataset, a key building block in modern data analysis. We apply the recent non-smoothed Inverse Sensitivity (IS) mechanism to this specific problem. We establish that the resulting method is closely related to the recently published ad hoc algorithm JointExp. In particular, they share the same computational complexity and a similar efficiency. We prove the statistical consistency of these two algorithms for continuous distributions. Furthermore, we demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this method suffers from an important lack of performance in the case of peaked distributions, which can degrade up to a potentially catastrophic impact in the presence of atoms. Its smoothed version (i.e. by applying a max kernel to its output density) would solve this problem, but remains an open challenge to implement. As a proxy, we propose a simple and numerically efficient method called Heuristically Smoothed JointExp (HSJointExp), which is endowed with performance guarantees for a broad class of distributions and achieves results that are orders of magnitude better on problematic datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.
Builds on
14 of 48 references.
References · 14
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
- 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 101
- 2019Differentially Private SQL with Bounded User Contributioncited by 27
- 2020Near Instance-Optimality in Differential Privacycited by 23
- 2021Differentially Private Quantilescited by 22
- 2020Propose, Test, Release: Differentially private estimation with high probabilitycited by 15
- 2015Technical Privacy Metrics: a Systematic Surveycited by 11
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraintscited by 6
- 2023Private Statistical Estimation of Many Quantilescited by 3
- 2022Differentially private multivariate medianscited by 2
- 2023About the Cost of Central Privacy in Density Estimationcited by 2
- 2025Learning with Differentially Private (Sliced) Wasserstein Gradientscited by 2
- 2025Learning with Differentially Private (Sliced) Wasserstein Gradients3 Feb 2025
- 2023About the Cost of Central Privacy in Density Estimation26 Jun 2023
- 2023Private Statistical Estimation of Many Quantiles14 Feb 2023
- 2022Differentially private multivariate medians12 Oct 2022
- 2022On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints5 Oct 2022