Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Earthquake monitoring is vital for understanding the physics of earthquakes and assessing seismic hazards. A standard monitoring workflow includes the interrelated and interdependent tasks of phase picking, association, and location. Although deep learning methods have been successfully applied to earthquake monitoring, they mostly address the tasks separately and ignore the geographic relationships among stations. Here, we propose a graph neural network that operates directly on multi-station seismic data and achieves simultaneous phase picking, association, and location. Particularly, the inter-station and inter-task physical relationships are informed in the network architecture to promote accuracy, interpretability, and physical consistency among cross-station and cross-task predictions. When applied to data from the Ridgecrest region and Japan regions, this method showed superior performance over previous deep learning-based phase-picking and localization methods. Overall, our study provides for the first time a prototype self-consistent all-in-one system of simultaneous seismic phase picking, association, and location, which has the potential for next-generation autonomous earthquake monitoring.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2023.
Builds on
23 of 88 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 971
11 more
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 506
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 492
- 2022CLRNet: Cross Layer Refinement Network for Lane Detectioncited by 82
- 2019Bayesian-Deep-Learning Estimation of Earthquake Location from Single-Station Observationscited by 16
- 2022Graph Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series Regression with Application to Seismic Datacited by 15
- 2018CRED: A Deep Residual Network of Convolutional and Recurrent Units for Earthquake Signal Detectioncited by 13
- 2018PhaseLink: A Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase Associationcited by 11
- 2022Earthquake Phase Association with Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2019A Machine-Learning Approach for Earthquake Magnitude Estimationcited by 10
- 2019Deep learning for seismic phase detection and picking in the aftershock zone of 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquakecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.