Earthquake Phase Association with Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Seismic phase association connects earthquake arrival time measurements to their causative sources. Effective association must determine the number of discrete events, their location and origin times, and it must differentiate real arrivals from measurement artifacts. The advent of deep learning pickers, which provide high rates of picks from closely overlapping small magnitude earthquakes, motivates revisiting the phase association problem and approaching it using the methods of deep learning. We have developed a Graph Neural Network associator that simultaneously predicts both source space-time localization, and discrete source-arrival association likelihoods. The method is applicable to arbitrary geometry, time-varying seismic networks of hundreds of stations, and is robust to high rates of sources and input picks with variable noise and quality. Our Graph Earthquake Neural Interpretation Engine (GENIE) uses one graph to represent the station set and another to represent the spatial source region. GENIE learns relationships from data in this combined representation that enable it to determine robust source and source-arrival associations. We train on synthetic data, and test our method on real data from the Northern California (NC) seismic network using input generated by the PhaseNet deep learning phase picker. We successfully re-detect ~96% of all events M>1 reported by the USGS during 500 random days between 2000unicodex20132022. Over a 100-day continuous interval of processing in 2017unicodex20132018, we detect ~4.2x the number of events reported by the USGS. Our new events have small magnitude estimates below the magnitude of completeness of the USGS catalog, and are located close to the active faults and quarries in the region. Our results demonstrate that GENIE can effectively solve the association problem under complex seismic monitoring conditions.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2022.
Builds on
21 of 75 references.
References · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
9 more
- 2017Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges and Applicationscited by 409
- 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 406
- 2019Position-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 203
- 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 197
- 2020Graph Information Bottleneckcited by 168
- 2018PhaseLink: A Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase Associationcited by 10
- 2017A multi-channel approach for automatic microseismic event association using RANSAC-based arrival time event clustering(RATEC)cited by 2
- 2021MAF-GNN: Multi-adaptive Spatiotemporal-flow Graph Neural Network for Traffic Speed Forecastingcited by 2
- 2019Beyond Correlation: A Path-Invariant Measure for Seismogram Similaritycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extractioncited by 8
- 2024Time Series Foundation Models and Deep Learning Architectures for Earthquake Temporal and Spatial Nowcastingcited by 3
- 2024Full-waveform earthquake source inversion using simulation-based inferencecited by 2
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)cited by 1
- 2024Double Difference Earthquake Location with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fieldscited by 0
- 2023Generalized Neural Networks for Real-Time Earthquake Early Warningcited by 0
- 2024Deep Learning Forecasts Caldera Collapse Events at Kilauea Volcanocited by 0
- 2025HEIMDALL: a grapH-based sEIsMic Detector And Locator for microseismicitycited by 0
- 2026Improving moment tensor solutions under Earth structure uncertainty with simulation-based inferencecited by 0
- 2026Improving moment tensor solutions under Earth structure uncertainty with simulation-based inference19 Mar 2026
- 2025HEIMDALL: a grapH-based sEIsMic Detector And Locator for microseismicity14 Jul 2025
- 2024Full-waveform earthquake source inversion using simulation-based inference30 Oct 2024
- 2024Double Difference Earthquake Location with Graph Neural Networks25 Oct 2024
- 2024Time Series Foundation Models and Deep Learning Architectures for Earthquake Temporal and Spatial Nowcasting21 Aug 2024
- 2024Deep Learning Forecasts Caldera Collapse Events at Kilauea Volcano30 Apr 2024
- 2023Generalized Neural Networks for Real-Time Earthquake Early Warning23 Dec 2023
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extraction5 Sep 2023
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fields14 Jul 2023
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)24 Jun 2023