PhaseLink: A Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase Association
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Seismic phase association is a fundamental task in seismology that pertains to linking together phase detections on different sensors that originate from a common earthquake. It is widely employed to detect earthquakes on permanent and temporary seismic networks, and underlies most seismicity catalogs produced around the world. This task can be challenging because the number of sources is unknown, events frequently overlap in time, or can occur simultaneously in different parts of a network. We present PhaseLink, a framework based on recent advances in deep learning for grid-free earthquake phase association. Our approach learns to link phases together that share a common origin, and is trained entirely on tens of millions of synthetic sequences of P- and S-wave arrival times generated using a simple 1D velocity model. Our approach is simple to implement for any tectonic regime, suitable for real-time processing, and can naturally incorporate errors in arrival time picks. Rather than tuning a set of ad hoc hyperparameters to improve performance, PhaseLink can be improved by simply adding examples of problematic cases to the training dataset. We demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of PhaseLink on a challenging recent sequence from southern California, and synthesized sequences from Japan designed to test the point at which the method fails. For the examined datasets, PhaseLink can precisely associate P- and S-picks to events that are separated by ~12 seconds in origin time. This approach is expected to improve the resolution of seismicity catalogs, add stability to real-time seismic monitoring, and streamline automated processing of large seismic datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Earthquake Phase Association with Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2021Deep Learning-based Damage Mapping with InSAR Coherence Time Seriescited by 8
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extractioncited by 8
- 2022Random Noise vs State-of-the-Art Probabilistic Forecasting Methods : A Case Study on CRPS-Sum Discrimination Abilitycited by 7
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)cited by 1
- 2024VAEneu: A New Avenue for VAE Application on Probabilistic Forecastingcited by 1
- 2024Double Difference Earthquake Location with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fieldscited by 0
- 2023Generalized Neural Networks for Real-Time Earthquake Early Warningcited by 0
- 2026Physics-Aware Machine Learning for Seismic and Volcanic Signal Interpretationcited by 0
- 2026Physics-Aware Machine Learning for Seismic and Volcanic Signal Interpretation18 Mar 2026
- 2024Double Difference Earthquake Location with Graph Neural Networks25 Oct 2024
- 2024VAEneu: A New Avenue for VAE Application on Probabilistic Forecasting7 May 2024
- 2023Generalized Neural Networks for Real-Time Earthquake Early Warning23 Dec 2023
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extraction5 Sep 2023
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fields14 Jul 2023
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)24 Jun 2023
- 2022Earthquake Phase Association with Graph Neural Networks15 Sep 2022
- 2022Random Noise vs State-of-the-Art Probabilistic Forecasting Methods : A Case Study on CRPS-Sum Discrimination Ability21 Jan 2022
- 2021Deep Learning-based Damage Mapping with InSAR Coherence Time Series24 May 2021