mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Correcting discount-factor mismatch in on-policy policy gradient methods

arXiv 2306.13284 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The policy gradient theorem gives a convenient form of the policy gradient in terms of three factors: an action value, a gradient of the action likelihood, and a state distribution involving discounting called the discounted stationary distribution. But commonly used on-policy methods based on the policy gradient theorem ignores the discount factor in the state distribution, which is technically incorrect and may even cause degenerate learning behavior in some environments. An existing solution corrects this discrepancy by using γt as a factor in the gradient estimate. However, this solution is not widely adopted and does not work well in tasks where the later states are similar to earlier states. We introduce a novel distribution correction to account for the discounted stationary distribution that can be plugged into many existing gradient estimators. Our correction circumvents the performance degradation associated with the γt correction with a lower variance. Importantly, compared to the uncorrected estimators, our algorithm provides improved state emphasis to evade suboptimal policies in certain environments and consistently matches or exceeds the original performance on several OpenAI gym and DeepMind suite benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2023.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  5. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  6. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  7. 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 121
  8. 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 119
  9. 2017Consistent On-Line Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 51
  10. 2019Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning by Bootstrapping the Covariate Shiftcited by 47
  11. 2019Is the Policy Gradient a Gradient?cited by 40
  12. 2018An Off-policy Policy Gradient Theorem Using Emphatic Weightingscited by 34
4 more
  1. 2015Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 16
  2. 2020A Deeper Look at Discounting Mismatch in Actor-Critic Algorithmscited by 10
  3. 2021Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RLcited by 5
  4. 2022Bayesian Q-learning With Imperfect Expert Demonstrationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.