Analysis of On-policy Policy Gradient Methods under the Distribution Mismatch
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy gradient methods are one of the most successful approaches for solving challenging reinforcement learning problems. Despite their empirical successes, many state-of-the-art policy gradient algorithms for discounted problems deviate from the theoretical policy gradient theorem due to the existence of a distribution mismatch. In this work, we analyze the impact of this mismatch on policy gradient methods. Specifically, we first show that in the case of tabular parameterizations, the biased gradient induced by the mismatch still yields a valid first-order characterization of global optimality. Then, we extend this analysis to more general parameterizations by deriving explicit bounds on both the state distribution mismatch and the resulting gradient mismatch in episodic and continuing MDPs, which are shown to vanish at least linearly as the discount factor approaches one. Building on these bounds, we further establish guarantees for the biased policy gradient iterates, showing that they approach approximate stationary points with respect to the exact gradient, with asymptotic residuals depending on the discount factor. Our findings offer insights into the robustness of policy gradient methods as well as the gap between theoretical foundations and practical implementations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
17 of 25 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
- 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 264
- 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classescited by 156
- 2019Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policiescited by 124
- 2018Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 106
- 2021Softmax Policy Gradient Methods Can Take Exponential Time to Convergecited by 48
- 2019Is the Policy Gradient a Gradient?cited by 40
- 2023A Guide Through the Zoo of Biased SGDcited by 40
5 more
- 2020A Deeper Look at Discounting Mismatch in Actor-Critic Algorithmscited by 10
- 2023Correcting discount-factor mismatch in on-policy policy gradient methodscited by 9
- 2023On the Second-Order Convergence of Biased Policy Gradient Algorithmscited by 5
- 2022A Temporal-Difference Approach to Policy Gradient Estimationcited by 4
- 2023Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Definitive Guide to Policy Gradients in Deep Reinforcement Learning: Theory, Algorithms and Implementations
- 2022Beyond the Policy Gradient Theorem for Efficient Policy Updates in Actor-Critic Algorithms
- 2024Strongly-polynomial time and validation analysis of policy gradient methods
- 2024Towards Provable Log Density Policy Gradient
- 2026Policy Gradient Methods for Non-Markovian Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Elementary Analysis of Policy Gradient Methods
- 2026Bayesian policy gradient and actor-critic algorithms
- 2025Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning