mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RL

arXiv 2107.05405 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Off-policy sampling and experience replay are key for improving sample efficiency and scaling model-free temporal difference learning methods. When combined with function approximation, such as neural networks, this combination is known as the deadly triad and is potentially unstable. Recently, it has been shown that stability and good performance at scale can be achieved by combining emphatic weightings and multi-step updates. This approach, however, is generally limited to sampling complete trajectories in order, to compute the required emphatic weighting. In this paper we investigate how to combine emphatic weightings with non-sequential, off-line data sampled from a replay buffer. We develop a multi-step emphatic weighting that can be combined with replay, and a time-reversed n-step TD learning algorithm to learn the required emphatic weighting. We show that these state weightings reduce variance compared with prior approaches, while providing convergence guarantees. We tested the approach at scale on Atari 2600 video games, and observed that the new X-ETD(n) agent improved over baseline agents, highlighting both the scalability and broad applicability of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2021.

Builds on

26 of 47 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  2. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  3. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  4. 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
  5. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  6. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  7. 2019Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 150
  8. 2018Multi-task Deep Reinforcement Learning with PopArtcited by 138
  9. 2019When to use parametric models in reinforcement learning?cited by 118
  10. 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
  11. 2020Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized Lagrangiancited by 86
  12. 2020GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 70
14 more
  1. 2021Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimizationcited by 53
  2. 2017Consistent On-Line Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 51
  3. 2019Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning by Bootstrapping the Covariate Shiftcited by 47
  4. 2019Off-Policy Policy Gradient with State Distribution Correctioncited by 43
  5. 2016Unifying task specification in reinforcement learningcited by 41
  6. 2021Podracer architectures for scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  7. 2018An Off-policy Policy Gradient Theorem Using Emphatic Weightingscited by 34
  8. 2020Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functionscited by 33
  9. 2020Expected Eligibility Tracescited by 27
  10. 2017Multi-step Off-policy Learning Without Importance Sampling Ratioscited by 19
  11. 2019Generalized Off-Policy Actor-Criticcited by 16
  12. 2021Emphatic Algorithms for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  13. 2018Online Off-policy Predictioncited by 9
  14. 2020Learning Retrospective Knowledge with Reverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.